Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  removal
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
In Poland there has been very little research on Japanese Canadians and their experience of incarceration during the Second World War. Therefore, this paper intends to fill in this gap. In particular, the article aims to examine the reaction of the Canadian government and society towards the Japanese Canadians in the face of the Pacific War. The paper also offers a review of the situation of the Japanese Canadian community in the pre-war Canada and describes the events that preceded and influenced the decision of the federal government to remove the Japanese Canadians from the West Coast. Since the wartime experiences of Japanese Americans and Japanese Canadians were similar, I decided to compare the fate of those two minorities after the Pearl Harbor attack. Also the Canadian policy towards the people of Japanese origin after the war is discussed here.
EN
The removal (Schub), i.e. the enforced transportation of people to their "official home", is today a forgotten process which existed in the Habsburg monarchy from the mid-18th century and was adopted by both the First Austrian Republic and First Czechoslovak Republic. This study analyses removal using legal-historical analyses and a micro-historical approach. An analysis of the legal rulings surroundig removal shows an ever greater centralization of the removal agenda and, a the same time, the decentralization of removal costs. The micro-historical approach presents a view of an ordinary day in a Moravian village in 1828, which lay on the main removal route. This study attempts to show how communities were put under pressure by removal, which regularly and over the long term drained human resources and was a source of conflict in the rural communities.
EN
The causes for which a pastor can be removed legitimately from his parish are especially the following: 1) a manner of acting which brings grave detriment or disturbance to ecclesiastical communion; 2) ineptitude or a permanent infirmity of mind or body which renders the pastor unable to fulfill his functions usefully; 3) loss of a good reputation among upright and responsible parishioners or an aversion to the pastor which it appears will not cease in a brief time; 4) grave neglect or violation of parochial duties which persists after a warning; 5) poor administration of temporal affairs with grave damage to the Church whenever another remedy to this harm cannot be found.
PL
Przyczyny, dla których proboszcz może być usunięty z parafii zgodnie z przepisami prawa, są zwłaszcza następujące: 1) sposób postępowania, który przynosi kościelnej wspólnocie poważną szkodę lub zamieszanie; 2) nieudolność albo trwała choroba umysłowa lub fizyczna, która czyni proboszcza nieużytecznym w wypełnianiu jego zadań; 3) utrata dobrego imienia u uczciwych i poważnych parafian lub niechęć w stosunku do proboszcza, które według przewidywania szybko nie ustaną; 4) poważne zaniedbanie lub naruszanie obowiązków parafialnych, które trwa mimo upomnienia; 5) złe zarządzanie dobrami doczesnymi, z wielką szkodą Kościoła, ilekroć na zaradzenie złu brak innego środka.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Utrata urzędu kościelnego

67%
PL
W Kościele funkcjonuje wiele służb, zadań i funkcji. Urząd kościelny jest zadaniem ustanowionym na stałe z postanowienia Bożego lub kościelnego dla realizacji celu duchowego. Istotnymi elementami urzędu kościelnego jest zadanie kościelne, ustanowienie Boże lub kościelne, stałość urzędu, cel duchowy oraz podmiot pełniący urząd. Dobro społeczności Kościoła oraz godność urzędów kościelnych domagają się, aby ich sprawowanie cechowało się stabilnością. Jednakże zasada stabilności urzędu nie jest bezwzględna. Warto więc przypomnieć, czym jest „urząd kościelny” oraz w jaki sposób można go utracić. Można wskazać kilka możliwości utraty urzędu kościelnego. Są to: utrata urzędu z natury rzeczy, rezygnacja, przeniesienie, usunięcie, pozbawienie. Analiz przepisów prawa dotyczących powierzenia urzędu kościelnego, jego wymogów i warunków przedstawiono już wiele. Dlatego w niniejszym artykule istotną kwestią jest utrata urzędu kościelnego.
EN
There are many services, tasks and functions in the Church. The ecclesiastical office is a task established permanently from a divine or ecclesiastical provision for the attainment of a spiritual goal. Essential elements of a church office are church tasks, divine or ecclesiastical estab¬lishments, constitution of the office, spiritual purpose and the entity performing the office. The good of the Church’s community and the dignity of ecclesiastical offices demand that their exercise be stable. However, the principle of stability of the office is not absolute. It is worth recalling what a “church office” is and how it can be lost. Can be indicate several possibilities of losing the church office. These are: loss of office by the nature of things, resignation, transfer, removal, deprivation. Analyzes of the legal provisions regarding entrusting to the ecclesiastical office, its requirements and conditions have already been presented. In this article an important issue is the loss of the ecclesiastical office.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.