Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  research system
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

How Do Selected National Funding Agencies Communicate the Concept of Cognitive Innovation on Their Public Website?

100%
Nasser M.
Avant
|
2017
|
issue 8
EN
In this paper, I discuss how three funding agencies have presented or discussed the concept of cognitive innovation in formulating their research programs, calls or funding opportunities on their website. Gummerum and Denham recognize the association between the innovator, innovation and the contextual challenge of the concept of cognitive innovation and its impact on society (Gummerum & Denham, 2014). Research funders make decisions to allocate resources to certain research questions and not others. Researchers attempt to understand how these decisions are made and consider them in applying for funding to them. One of the information sources that researchers can use to inform what areas of research they can get funding for or how to formulate their research grants is the public information on the website of the funding agencies. In this paper, I only focus on the information presented on their website and not their internal processes or policies. The approach of funding agencies to present what is categorized as innovation or creativity has the potential to influence how researchers focus or frame their research.
2
Content available remote

How Do Selected National Funding Agencies Communicate the Concept of Cognitive Innovation on Their Public Website?

100%
Nasser M.
Avant
|
2017
|
vol. 8
EN
In this paper, I discuss how three funding agencies have presented or discussed the concept of cognitive innovation in formulating their research programs, calls or funding opportunities on their website. Gummerum and Denham recognize the association between the innovator, innovation and the contextual challenge of the concept of cognitive innovation and its impact on society (Gummerum & Denham, 2014). Research funders make decisions to allocate resources to certain research questions and not others. Researchers attempt to understand how these decisions are made and consider them in applying for funding to them. One of the information sources that researchers can use to inform what areas of research they can get funding for or how to formulate their research grants is the public information on the website of the funding agencies. In this paper, I only focus on the information presented on their website and not their internal processes or policies. The approach of funding agencies to present what is categorized as innovation or creativity has the potential to influence how researchers focus or frame their research.
3

R&D: Italy and Poland Compared

63%
Fino V., Rosiek J.
Argumenta Oeconomica Cracoviensia
|
2016
|
issue 15
109-131
EN
Innovation and R&D are primary policy factors when governments seek to address major societal challenges through state-level welfare initiatives, and are essential elements in balancing socio-economic development. It is for this reason that the European Union and the governments of its member states have launched a series of initiatives, such as the Lisbon strategy, the Europe 2020 Strategy, the Green Paper on Innovation, and the Action Plan for Innovation in Europe, to stimulate and support innovation and R&D. The article reviews the literature on the theory of innovation in terms of its impact on R&D and compares the development activity undertaken in this area in Poland and Italy. Underpinned by quantitative data and a SWOT analysis, it then presents a comparative analysis of these countries’ research systems. The conclusion specifies policy initiatives that could be taken by Poland and Italy to encourage innovation-based R&D.
PL
Innowacje oraz badania i rozwój (B+R) stanowią istotne sfery działalności w nowoczesnych społeczeństwach oraz zasadniczy element polityki rządów, które chcą sprostać kluczowym wyzwaniom społecznym związanym z implementacją koncepcji państwa dobrobytu do gospodarek narodowych. Ponadto aktywność w tych dziedzinach stanowi istotny element równoważenia ich rozwoju społeczno-gospodarczego. Z tego powodu Unia Europejska, a także rządy krajów członkowskich ugrupowania starają się stwarzać bodźce stymulujące rozwój tego rodzaju aktywności, przede wszystkim poprzez podejmowanie wielu inicjatyw mających na celu jej wspieranie, takich jak strategia lizbońska, strategia Europa 2020, zielona księga innowacji, plan działań na rzecz wspierania innowacji w Europie. W niniejszym artykule dokonano przeglądu literatury w zakresie teorii innowacji, w aspekcie jej oddziaływania na sferę B+R, a także porównano rozwój aktywności w tym obszarze pomiędzy Polską a Włochami. Podstawę prowadzonych rozważań stanowią: dane ilościowe, analiza SWOT oraz analiza porównawcza sposobu funkcjonowania systemów badawczych w tych krajach. W końcowej części opracowania zostały zamieszczone wnioski i rekomendacje odnośnie do pożądanego kierunku i charakteru polityki tych krajów w ramach wspierania działalności w zakresie B+R opartej na innowacjach.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.