Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  ridicule
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The author reflects on the problem of social transformation in terms of receiving and classifying humor, as shown by the example of disappearing lyrical species called ‘trifle’. In his view, contemporary Polish poetry (and, in fact, all world literature) avoids decidedly satirical and humorous forms. Poetry is domi-nated by discreet and mixed humor, such as black humor, irony, pure-nonsense, mockery, persiflage, derision, grotesque. The analysis is based on poetry by the artists of three generations: Tadeusz Rozewicz, Bohdan Zadura and Krzysztof Jaworski.
EN
Socialism produces distinct forms of humorous ridicule that are relatively rare in capitalist, bourgeois democracies. These forms are arranged in a hierarchy that reflects the distribution of power in this type of social and political order, one which differs markedly from a bourgeois democracy or indeed even a traditional or dictatorial authoritarian society. Merely authoritarian societies lack the kind of over-riding ideology and central control of economic and cultural life that are the defining characteristics of socialism. Socialist humorous ridicule is cruel at the top; then comes an aggressive and admonishing, but in intention humorous, official ridicule employed by the state in pursuit of centrally defined political ends. Finally, there is the ridicule by ordinary people of the elite and the social order they have imposed on the masses who respond by spontaneously and autonomously inventing and circulating innumerable jokes and anecdotes. This pattern is a product of the exercise of a monopoly of political and economic power by the leaders of the Communist Party and the distinctive political inequality that characterises socialism, an inequality based not on ownership but on differential access to the power of the state. The rulers of merely authoritarian societies that were not socialist such as Franco’s Spain, Pinochet’s Chile or Afrikaner South Africa did not and could not attain the same kind of hegemony that was possible under socialism because there existed economic, religious, scientific and even legal institutions that enjoyed a substantial degree of independence from their political rulers. Accordingly, they did not exhibit to anything like the full extent the patterns of humour to be found under socialism. The aggregate patterns of humour in socialist societies must be treated not as interactions between individuals but as ‘social facts’ to be understood in relation to other social facts, notably the nature of political power, with both sets of social facts being contrasted with those to be found in the capitalist democracies that are the antithesis of socialism.
PL
Artykuł opisuje zjawisko określane jako „parental trolling” oraz wybrane zagadnienia prawne z nim związane. W dzisiejszych czasach z „parental trollingiem” spotykamy się codziennie na całym świecie. Przez ostatnie lata obserwujemy dynamiczny rozwój tego zjawiska również w Polsce. Każdego dnia możemy znaleźć kompromitujące zdjęcia dzieci umieszczone przez ich rodziców w mediach społecznościowych (zwłaszcza na portalach Facebook i Instagram). Praca wyjaśnia pojęcie „parental trolling” oraz omawia sprawę zakończoną prawomocnym wyrokiem w 2017 roku. Był to pierwszy wyrok skazujący wydany w Polsce za umieszczenie w Internecie ośmieszającego zdjęcia dziecka przez jednego z rodziców. Referat porusza również sferę wykonywania władzy rodzicielskiej oraz przedstawia problem umieszczania kompromitujących zdjęć własnych dzieci w kontekście naruszenia: – zasady dobra dziecka wynikającej z Konstytucji oraz Kodeksu rodzinnego i opiekuńczego, – zasady dóbr osobistych wynikającej z Kodeksu cywilnego, – zasady godności osobistej wynikającej z Konstytucji
EN
This essay describes the phenomenon of parental trolling. Nowadays, parental trolling is becoming more and more popular all over the world. For several years, we have been observing this phenomenon in Poland. Every day we can find some embarrassing photos of children posted by their parents on Facebook or Instagram. This paper explains the concept of “parental trolling” and discusses the case which ended with a valid court verdict in 2017. It was the first sentence for parental trolling in Poland. The author discusses the problem of exercising parental authority and the phenomenon of parental trolling as a violation of: – principles of the good of the child resulting from the Constitution of the Republic of Poland and The Family and Guardianship Code, – personal rights resulting from the Civil Code, – principles of human dignity resulting from the Constitution of the Republic of Poland.
EN
The article explores the circumstances of writing and publication of the essay Sensus Communis by Anthony Ashley Cooper, the Third Earl of Shaftesbury, so as to fix its place in Shaftesbury’s body of work. Shaftesbury himself did not employ the eponymous term elsewhere in his works and the author argues that its introduction in the essay did not present a significant conceptual enrichment of Shaftesbury’s doctrine. The introduction of the term is interpreted as a tool for answering Shaftesbury critics. First, Jonathan Swift’s A Tale of a Tub is proposed as a stimulus for Shaftesbury’s concern with raillery in his Letter concerning Enthusiasm. Second, Mary Astell is singled out among the critics of the Letter as the one who put forth the most elaborate analysis, including an argument from common sense against Shaftesbury’s test by raillery.
CS
Cílem autora článku je alespoň zčásti objasnit místo eseje Sensus Communis v Shaftesburyho díle, resp. ukázat, jak dalece jsou při vysvětlení v něm vyložené koncepce zdravého rozumu nápomocny informace o okolnostech jeho vzniku. Ve svých dalších textech totiž Shaftesbury s tímto pojmem nepracuje. Autor zdůrazňuje, že zavedení tohoto pojmu nepředstavuje rozšíření Shaftesburyho filosofie ze systematického hlediska. Za Shaftesburyho zájmem o vtip a posměch spatřuje vliv Swiftovy Pohádky o kádi a samotný esej vykládá jako reakci na kritiku Dopisu o entusiasmu. Zdůrazňuje zejména vliv Mary Astellové, jež ve své zevrubné kritice Shaftesburyho Dopisu použila také argument z common sense.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.