Search results

1

The Principles of Subsidiarity and Effectiveness: Two Pillars of an Effective Remedy for Excessive Length of Proceedings within the Meaning of Article 13 ECHR

100%

Morawska E.

Polish Yearbook of International Law

|

2019

|

vol. 39

159-185

EN

The purpose of this article is to determine the relationship between the principles of subsidiarity and effectiveness and an effective remedy for the excessive length of proceedings within the legal order of the European Convention on Human Rights. The article assumes that these key principles of the ECHR’s legal order have an impact on such a remedy, both in the normative and practical dimensions. This assumption has helped explain many aspects of the Strasbourg case law regarding this remedy. Concerning the relationship of this remedy with the principle of subsidiarity, it raises issues such as: the “reinforcing” of Art. 6 § 1; the “close affinity” of Arts. 13 and 35 § 1; and the arguability test. In turn, through the prism of the principle of effectiveness, the reasonableness criterion and the requirement of diligence in the proceedings are presented, followed by the obligations of States to prevent lengthiness of proceedings and the obligations concerning adequate and sufficient redress for such an excessive length of proceedings. The analysis shows that an effective remedy with respect to the excessive length of proceedings is not a defnitive normative item, as the Court consistently adds new elements to its complex structure, taking into account complaints regarding the law and practice of States Parties in the prevention of and compensation for proceedings of an excessive length.

2

New Hungarian Institutions against Administrative Silence: Friends or Foes of the Parties?

84%

Rozsnyai K. F., Hoffman I.

Studia Iuridica Lublinensia

|

2020

|

vol. 29

|

issue 1

EN

The Programme for the Reduction of Bureaucracy launched by the Hungarian government in 2015 has several directions, such as rethinking of the system of administrative organs, reshaping of civil service, simplification of administrative procedures, and fight against administrative silence, as well. New codes on the administrative procedure and on the judicial review of the administrative decisions were passed in 2016 and 2017, and the sectoral regulation has been transformed, as well. The most important change of the sectoral procedural rules was the replacement of procedures for permissions to a simple duty of notification. The authors investigate, if these institutions really help to reduce the burdens citizens and companies have in connection with bureaucracy: whether they are efficient tools against administrative silence and really are improving the situation of the parties vis-à-vis the administration and fostering good administration. They also take a closer look on the newly established action for failure to Act I of 2017 on the Code of Administrative Court Procedure (in force since 2018) intended as an additional tool, as well as its other new institutions addressing the problem of silence of administration.

PL

Rozpoczęty w 2015 r. przez rząd węgierski Program Ograniczenia Biurokracji zawiera kilka kierunków, jak np. zmiana koncepcji systemu organów administracyjnych, zmiana kształtu służby cywilnej, uproszczenie procedur administracyjnych, a także walka z milczeniem organów administracji. W latach 2016 i 2017 wprowadzono nowe kodeksy postępowania administracyjnego i sądowoadministracyjnego oraz znowelizowano regulacje sektorowe. Najważniejszą zmianą w sektorowych przepisach postępowania była zamiana procedur związanych z uzyskaniem zgody na prosty obowiązek zgłoszenia. Przedmiotem artykułu było zbadanie, czy instytucje te istotnie pomagają w ograniczeniu biurokratycznych obciążeń obywateli i przedsiębiorstw oraz czy są one skutecznym narzędziem do radzenia sobie z milczeniem organów administracji i czy faktycznie poprawiają sytuację stron wobec administracji i sprzyjają dobrej administracji. Artykuł przybliża również nowo ustanowioną w Kodeksie postępowania sądowoadministracyjnego (obowiązującym od 2018 r.) skargę z tytułu bezczynności, pomyślaną jako dodatkowe narzędzie, a także nowe instytucje tego kodeksu dotyczące problemu milczenia organu administracji.

3

O niekonstytucyjności § 95 ust. 2 zd. 2 Regulaminu urzędowania sądów powszechnych

84%

Łukowiak B.

Przegląd Prawa i Administracji

|

2019

|

vol. 116

59 - 71

EN

The subject of this work is the issue of the constitutionality of § 9522 of the Rules of Procedure of Common Courts. Based on the analysis of regulations in the field of criminal proceedings, the author tries to demonstrate the non-compliance of this provision with the principle of the right to defence, the principle of the right to an effective remedy, the principle of the exclusivity of the act and the prohibition of creating apparent powers, and, therefore, proposes its own, different regulation of this issue, which would allow for compliance of national regulations with the standards of fair trial.

Refine search results

1 Polish Yearbook of International Law

1 Przegląd Prawa i Administracji

1 Studia Iuridica Lublinensia

1 Hoffman I.

1 Morawska E.

1 Rozsnyai K. F.

1 Łukowiak B.

2 2020

1 2019

The Principles of Subsidiarity and Effectiveness: Two Pillars of an Effective Remedy for Excessive Length of Proceedings within the Meaning of Article 13 ECHR

New Hungarian Institutions against Administrative Silence: Friends or Foes of the Parties?

O niekonstytucyjności § 95 ust. 2 zd. 2 Regulaminu urzędowania sądów powszechnych