Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  right to healthcare
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The article presents the case of Dr. Aleck Bourne, which the author proposes to include in the catalog of borderline cases constituting the basis for in-depth discussions on ethical and legal aspects of human life with regard to the development of biology and medicine. The starting point is the presentation of the worldwide models for regulating the practice of abortion as well as the Polish regulation, together with a discussion on the role of the Constitutional Tribunal in shaping current legal provisions. The author notes that the interpretation of the right to life adopted by the Tribunal encourages the repeal of the indication model and the introduction of a complete ban on abortion, which will have significant consequences for ordinary legislation. Apart from describing the facts in the Bourne case, the strategy adopted by the defense and the sentence itself, the possible further areas of considerations regarding the limits of permissibility of termination of pregnancy have been signaled. Then, the conclusions resulting from legal analysis of the case were transferred to the exegesis of the constitutional principles of the right to life and the right to healthcare. Their constitutional form, interpretation resulting from the rulings of the Constitutional Tribunal and the ordinary legislation have been presented. The author indicates the main terminological deficiencies identified in this respect: the lack of any definition of the beginning of a human being, the existence of two separate criteria for determining death, which could lead to different results and the lack of an unambiguous definition of disease adopted by the legislator. Based on the concepts presented in the case, the right to healthcare has been defined as a legal right resulting from the right to life. The final thesis is that there are no grounds for hierarchizing these rights, as they are intertwined in content and function.
2
Content available remote

The Right to Healthcare under European Law

100%
Diametros
|
2017
|
issue 51
173-195
EN
Too often, the right to healthcare has been considered an illusory right that is not even a legal right, but merely an aspirational norm that cannot be adjudicated before the court. In modern human rights law, considering individual and social rights as interdependent and indivisible, such an approach is untenable. Both legal doctrine and recent case law from domestic and international courts have elaborated and confirmed the specific obligations under the right to healthcare, countering the general complaint of “shrouded vagueness”. Landmark cases have even provided a functional remedy to enforce individual healthcare claims successfully. This paper will examine the revised legal status and content of such a right to healthcare from a European perspective.
PL
Celem artykułu jest przedstawienie problematyki ochrony zdrowia z punktu widzenia publicznych praw podmiotowych jednostek. W pracy rozważana jest możliwość dochodzenia przez jednostkę roszczeń z zakresu ochrony zdrowia. Podejmowana jest również próba zdefiniowania prawa do ochrony zdrowia w kontekście istniejącej systematyki praw podstawowych oraz praw socjalnych. W ramach omawianego tematu przytaczane są również poglądy polskiego orzecznictwa, jak i doktryny.
EN
The aim of the article is to analyze the problem of healthcare system with taking under the consideration the point of view of fundamental rights of individuals. The article also presents possible ways to enforce healthcare rights belonging to individuals. The author tries to define the right to healthcare in the context of fundamental and social rights. To prove the thesis presented in the article, the author mentions judgments of the courts and the views established among legal scholars.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.