Search results

1

Property Issues Relating to Deep-Seabed Mining in the Light of the United Convention on the Sea of 1982

100%

Hennicke L.

Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review

|

2014

|

vol. 4

207-212

EN

The study aims at the evaluation of the right to property in the context of the deep-seabed mining. The author present deep-seabed mining in the light of the United Convention on the Sea of 1982 focusing on the lack of knowledge about the oceans and the lack of regulations regarding the protection and enhancement of the oceans.

2

Komentarz na kanwie Uchwały Naczelnego Sądu Administracyjnego I FPS 1/21 – sądowa kontrola instrumentalnego wszczęcia postępowania karnego skarbowego a prawo do sądu

65%

Szymacha A., Rogalski K.

Finanse i Prawo Finansowe

|

2021

|

vol. 3

|

issue 31

151-162

EN

The purpose of the article/hypothesis: The presented article focuses on a new resolution of the Supreme Administrative Court I FPS 1/21. In this resolution an assessment of instrumental initiation of criminal fiscal proceedings in order to suspend the running of the limitation period of a tax liability has been undertaken. The Supreme Administrative Court assessed that administrative courts have the right to examine the legitimacy of initiation of such proceedings. This position is important insofar as it also touches upon the issue of the right to a fair trial, as well as the right to property and legal certainty. The main aim of this article is to check the impact of this resolution on described fundamental rights. Methodology: This article will use the comparative law method. Especially the case law of different courts will be shown. The dogmatic-legal method will also be used as an auxiliary. Results of the research: This resolution is crucial for the fundamental right for fail trial. It has also impact on the right to property and principle of legal certainity. It may also be some element that strengthens the rule of law.

3

Nieprzedawnialne roszczenia majątkowe w prawie cywilnym

65%

Grochowski M.

Studia Prawnicze

|

2016

|

issue 3 (207)

149-171

EN

The text deals with the question of proprietary claims in the Polish civil law, which are exempted from prescription. The existence of such claims is a clear exception from the general rule set forth in Article 117 of the Civil Code (hereinafter: “CC”), which embraces all the proprietary claims with the general concept of prescription after the elapse of particular term (specified further in the following provisions). The article tries to explore the premises behind the general concept of lack of prescription, as well as to identify particular reasons for disapplication of Article 117 CC on the grounds of particular types of claims. The statute exempts explicitly two types of claims from prescription. It is the case of Article 223 § 1 CC, declaring lack of prescription for the damage claims supplementary to vindicatory claim. Similarly, according to Article 220 CC prescription does not embrace a claim for dissolution of co-ownership. In the other instances, the similar conclusion is derived in interpretation, mainly upon functional and systematic arguments. The case-law and the private law scholarship identify five examples of such claims. In all of these instances, the main reason behind disapplication of prescription rules is the close link of this claims with real property. Prescription of these claims and, hence, the possibility to transform them into natural obligations, seem from this perspective counter-functional and difficult to reconcile with the other principles and provisions of property law. It pertains, first of all, to the claims for establishing a way of necessity ease (Article 145 and 146 CC). Secondly, the same view is adopted for art. 151 CC, regarding another type of easement – available in the case of unintentional introducing a building or another facility behind the border of the somebody else’s ground. Thirdly, in the similar case of the intruding with a construction into another real property, the lack of prescription is adopted as regards the claim for transfer of title to the occupied part of the ground (Article 231 § 1 CC). Fourthly, the lack of prescription has been approved for the claim for establishing a transmission servitude (art. 3052 CC). Fifthly, the same solution has been proposed for the claim for transfer of title in performance of the contract with solely obligatory effects. This interpretation has been, however, rejected in the subsequent case-law and does not seem to be acclaimed currently.

4

Natura 2000 w polskim porządku prawnym w kontekście ochrony praw jednostki

63%

Stępkowski Ł.

Studenckie Prace Prawnicze, Administratywistyczne i Ekonomiczne

|

2015

|

vol. 17

169 - 184

EN

Due to the lack of any possibility of judicial review of the creation of a Natura 2000 area under Polish law, the individual concerned finds oneself in the situation depicted by the ECHR in Andersson, which, in turn, has been noted by the academia and the Polish Ombudsman, to no legislative changes — which mirrors the thesis of the paper. As the law stands, an individual cannot at times pursue any legal remedy, compensation included. The author postulates to amend Article 129 of the Polish Law on the Protection of Environment to enable individuals to claim legal losses incurred because of a Natura 2000 area and to, in any event, allow full judicial review and compensation.

5

Polski wymiar sprawiedliwości z punktu widzenia ekonomii instytucjonalnej

54%

Balcerowicz L.

Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny

|

2014

|

vol. 76

|

issue 2

175-190

EN

This paper contains general characteristics of a regime (being an institutional system) and a discussion on the specificity of socialism as a type of regime and its repressiveness. It also presents the type of institutional changes implemented after socialism and, in particular, in the wording of the laws and the system of types of organisation. Against this background, institutional factors fundamental for economy are analysed, and two main aspects of law enforcement and administration of justice: the (in)effectiveness and (in)justice are discussed with a special focus on Poland’s reality.

PL

Artykuł zawiera ogólną charakterystykę ustroju (systemu instytucjonalnego), a następnie omawia specyfikę socjalizmu jako ustroju, podkreślając jego represyjność. Kolejnym tematem są typy zmian instytucjonalnych po socjalizmie, zwłaszcza w treści praw oraz w systemie typów organizacji. Na tym tle analizowane są te czynniki instytucjonalne, które mają szczególne znaczenie dla gospodarki. Omawiane są dwa fundamentalne aspekty aparatu ścigania i wymiaru sprawiedliwości – generalnie i ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem Polski: (nie)efektywność i (nie)sprawiedliwość.

6

Ograniczenia prawa własności w polskim prawie konstytucyjnym

51%

Sawicka D.

Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego

|

2020

|

issue 4 (56)

309--323

PL

Własność jako prawo podmiotowe o bezwzględnym charakterze nie jest prawem absolutnym i nieograniczonym. Konstytucyjnie zagwarantowane prawo własności może w określonych przypadkach oraz przy zachowaniu odpowiednich przesłanek podlegać ograniczeniom. Zgodnie z brzmieniem art. 31 ust. 3 Konstytucji Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej konieczność wprowadzenia ograniczenia w zakresie korzystania z konstytucyjnych wolności i praw, w tym prawa własności, jest możliwe tylko przy uwzględnieniu kryterium państwa demokratycznego. Możliwość nienaruszającej istoty prawa ingerencji w prawo własności znalazło również wyraz w art. 64 Konstytucji, zgodnie z którym każdemu przysługuje prawo do własności. Ocena dopuszczalności ingerencji w prawo własności odbywa się świetle niezdefiniowanych w zupełny sposób zasady proporcjonalności oraz zasady istoty prawa własności, co wpływa na sposób rozstrzygania w przedmiocie konstytucyjności danego ograniczenia tego prawa.

EN

The right to property as an implicit subjective right is not an absolute and unlimited. The constitutionally guaranteed right to property may, in certain cases and under appropriate conditions, be restricted. According to the Article 31(3) of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland, the necessity to introduce limitations in the exercise of constitutional freedoms and rights, including the right to property, is only possible if the criterion of a democratic state is taken into account. The possibility of statutory and non-violent interference in the right to property was also expressed in Article 64 of the Constitution, according to which everyone is entitled to the right to property. The assessment of the admissibility of interference in the right to property takes place in the light of undefined in a complete manner the principle of proportionality and the principle of the essence of the property right, which affects the manner of resolving the issue of the constitutionality of a given limitation of this right.

Refine search results

1 Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review

1 Finanse i Prawo Finansowe

1 Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego

1 Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny

1 Studenckie Prace Prawnicze, Administratywistyczne i Ekonomiczne

1 Studia Prawnicze

1 Balcerowicz L.

1 Grochowski M.

1 Hennicke L.

1 Rogalski K.

1 Sawicka D.

1 Stępkowski Ł.

1 Szymacha A.

1 2021

1 2020

1 2016