Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Journals help

  1. 1 Rejent

Authors help

  1. 1 Pazdan M.

Years help

  1. 1 2021

Results found: 1

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  rozporządzenie UE nr 650/2012
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

Czy polski notariusz może być uważany za sąd w rozumieniu art. 3 ust. 2 rozporządzenia nr 650/2012?

100%
Pazdan M.
Rejent
|
2021
|
issue 9 (365)
11-34
EN
In this article, we can find a view criticism, according to art. 36 § 2 sentence 1 of the Family and Guardianship Code the contents of which serve to indicate that statutory mutual statutory representation of the spouses to make the activity of managing the assets of the spouses. In the author’s opinion a role of this provision is different. From art. 36 § 2 sentence 1 of the Family and Guardianship Code the authorization of each spouse results remaining in a joint marital property regime to exercise independently joint subjective rights towards third parties, i.e. the marital property subjective rights, including entitlement to disposal of these rights. In case of the legal acts obliging one of spouses to enter into financial commitment does not mean that another spouse is his/her party. In case of acquiring a property right by one of the spouses, its covering with the joint property of the spouses is a consequence of obliging art. 31 § 1 sentence 1 of the Family and Guardianship Code, and also art. 33 point 2 in fine of the Family and Guardianship Code.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.