Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  rule-following
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

Rule-Following, Meaning Constitution, and Enaction

100%
Presti P. L.
Human Affairs
|
2015
|
vol. 25
|
issue 1
110-120
EN
The paper submits a criticism of the standard formulation of Wittgenstein’s rule-following paradox. According to the standard formulation, influenced by Kripke, the paradox invites us to consider what mental or behavioral items could constitute meaning. The author proposes instead an enactivist understanding of the paradox. On this account there is no essential gap between mental items and behavioral patterns such that the paradox enforces a choice between meaning being constituted either internally ‘in mind,’ or externally ‘in behavior.’ The paper begins with an introduction to the paradox and then presents arguments against standard solutions. It ends with the enactivist proposal, admitting that although much more needs to be said before it can be established as a full-fledged alternative, it nonetheless holds some promise both for revising our understanding of the paradox and for the formulation of a novel solution.
2
Content available remote

Lze falzifikovat umělecké dílo?:

72%
Kolman V.
Filosofický časopis (Philosophical Journal)
|
2020
|
vol. 68
|
issue 5
755-764
EN
The author discusses Kulka’s study on aesthetics, especially in regards to the system he presents for the quantification of the value of a work of art; the article also deals in detail with certain “positivist” features of Kulka’s approach to art. From these the author then provides a detailed critique of selected examples. At the same time, however, he appreciates the readable and intellectually stimulating nature of Kulka’s book and of his texts in general.
CS
Autor diskutuje Kulkovu estetickou studii zejména ve vztahu k předkládanému schématu kvantifikace hodnoty uměleckého díla a zabývá se podrobně také jistými „pozitivistickými“ rysy Kulkova přístupu k tématu umění. Tyto pak na vybraných příkladech podrobně kritizuje. Současně však oceňuje zejména čtivou a myšlenkově stimulující povahu Kulkovy knihy a jeho textů obecně.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Gödel, Wittgenstein and the Sensibility of Platonism

72%
Poręba M.
Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture
|
2021
|
vol. 5
|
issue 1
108-125
EN
The paper presents an interpretation of Platonism, the seeds of which can be found in the writings of Gödel and Wittgenstein. Although it is widely accepted that Wittgenstein is an anti-Platonist the author points to some striking affinities between Gödel’s and Wittgenstein’s accounts of mathematical concepts and the role of feeling and intuition in mathematics. A version of Platonism emerging from these considerations combines realism with respect to concepts with a view of concepts as accessible to feeling and able to guide our behavior through feeling.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Emocje epistemiczne i normatywność albo o tym jak pokochać teorię znaczenia

72%
Kozak P.
Studia Philosophiae Christianae
|
2018
|
vol. 54
|
issue 1
121-141
EN
The aim of this paper is to discuss the content and cognitive function of epistemic emotions such as feelings of correctness and incorrectness. I claim that a proper explanation of such feelings should take into consideration the non-metarepresentational, non-criterial, and non-discursive character of epistemic emotions. With reference to the issue of primitive normativity and rule-following, I argue that we can connect epistemic emotions with the problem of meaning and claim that a specific class of epistemic emotions, i.e. feelings of correctness and incorrectness, is a necessary condition of meaning.
PL
Celem artykułu jest omówienie zagadnienia treści i funkcji tzw. emocji epistemicznych, takich jak poczucie poprawności i niepoprawności. Twierdzę, że odpowiednie wyjaśnienie tych ostatnich powinno uwzględnić ich nie-metareprezentacyjny, niedykursywny i pozbawiony kryteriów charakter. W nawiązaniu do zagadnienia tzw. normatywności pierwotnej i problemu kierowania się regułą twierdzę, że możemy powiązać emocje epistemiczne z teorią znaczenia i argumentuję, że pewna klasa emocji epistemicznych, tj. poczucie poprawności i niepoprawności, stanowi warunek konieczny znaczenia.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.