Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  rural peripheral areas
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The aim of the article is to systematize the achievements in the theoretical foundations of selecteddevelopment concepts in relation to the development of territorial units located in rural peripheral areas andconcepts useful in the diagnosis and management of local development. The work reviews the concept of socio-economic development: sustainable, multifunctional, neo-endogenous, intelligent and inclusive, and the conceptof path dependency, resilience and territorial approach as a concept referring to diagnosis and developmentmanagement. Sustainable development was considered a superior concept, which results from the axiologicalpotential – the concept of development adopting an over-centric value system as an axiological foundation. Atthe same time, it was recognized that the local system (with economic periphery features) lacking sufficient ownpotential requires intervention by public authorities, which, through the implementation of specific policies,should stimulate the stimulation of endogenous potential. On the other hand, the operationalization of the smartvillages concept makes it possible to identify rural growth poles, in relation to which the support should beaimed at increasing their supralocal influence.
EN
Ongoing discussions concerning the concept of development applied within the context of peripheral regions (including rural development, regional development, sustainable development, local development, etc.), and particularly its critical deconstruction, encourage us to look for new theoretical approaches and terminological constructs that would be useful in research and design of desired changes taking place in rural areas and that could substitute the contested notion of “development.” The text discusses strengths and weaknesses of “sustainable rural livelihood” — as a concept, as well as a framework of academic analysis and action — in the context of its application within “rural development” studies.
PL
Bieżące dyskusje na temat koncepcji rozwoju wdrażanych w regionach peryferyjnych (w tym rozwoju obszarów wiejskich, rozwoju regionalnego, zrównoważonego rozwoju, rozwoju lokalnego, itp.), a zwłaszcza ich krytyczna dekonstrukcja, zachęcają do poszukiwania nowych ujęć teoretycznych i terminologicznych które mogłyby być przydatne w badaniach i projektowaniu pożądanych zmian zachodzących na obszarach wiejskich, a zarazem mogłyby zastąpić coraz częściej odrzucane pojęcie ‘rozwoju’. Tekst omawia mocne i słabe strony jednej z nowych koncepcji określanych mianem „zrównoważonego zabezpieczenia egzystencji w środowisku wiejskim” (sustainable rural livelihoods ) uwzględniając samo pojęcie, jak i przydatność koncepcji w badaniach naukowych obszarów peryferyjnych, oraz prowadzonych w terenie działań rozwojowych.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.