Results found: 2

Search results

Search:
in the keywords: saturated phenomenon

Sort By:

Limit search:

That which Cannot be Said: My Flesh and the Face of the Other in the Poetry of John Donne

100%

Grzegorzewska M.

Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies

2016

issue 25/1

5-25

The article offers an analysis of selected poems of John Donne, viewed through the prism of traditional theological thought (the works of Hans von Balthasar) and current philosophical debates. In particular, the author draws upon the works of Jean-Luc Marion and Richard Kearney who take up the task of scrutinizing the heritage of phenomenological thought. Both thinkers address the questions arising from philosophy’s renewed interest in religion initiated in twentieth-century post-phenomenology. The analysis concentrates on bodily pain and love ecstasies as the modalities of human flesh. The author of the paper adapts for the purposes of literary criticism Jean-Luc Marion’s concept of a “saturated phenomenon” which surprises and bedazzles the perceiving subject by overflowing his or her intention at the moment of its unexpected arrival. The aim of the article is to highlight the religious and philosophical potential of Metaphysical Poetry.

Fenomenologia i twarz innego. Kontrowersje wokół Lévinasa

72%

Drwięga M.

Logos i Ethos

2019

vol. 49

issue 1

In the paper the author would like to draw readers’ attention to the discussion about the other’s face. The point of reference is the philosophy of E. Lévinas. The French philosopher considered himself a phenomenologist, but if so, someone may ask: what kind of phenomenology is it? and how should be the phenomenon understood? These questions led to a vivid discussion. On the one hand, there is D. Janicaud who severely criticized Lévinas for having made “a theological turn” and thus for having abandoned phenomenology for theology. On the other hand, J.-L. Marion tried to reformulate the Lévinas central idea of the other’s face in a language of the new phenomenology. In the paper the author first presents the position of Lévinas about phenomenology, then goes into critical arguments and discuss them, finally he tries to reformulate in the new way the phenomenon of the other’s face, it means in terms of J.-L. Marion’s new phenomenology.

W artykule podejmuję dyskusję dotyczącą twarzy innego. Punktem odniesienia będą poglądy E. Lévinasa, który uważał się za fenomenologa. Powstaje pytanie: jakiego rodzaju jest to fenomenologia? Jak rozumieć fenomen? Pytania te wywołały żywą dyskusję. Z jednej strony spotkały się one z krytyką. D. Janicaud zarzuca Lévinasowi „teologiczny zwrot” i porzucenie fenomenologii na rzecz teologii. Z drugiej J. L. Marion stara się przeformułować analizy Lévinasa w duchu nowej fenomenologii. W mojej argumentacji przedstawię najpierw poglądy Lévinasa dotyczące fenomenologii, następnie uwagi krytyczne pod jego adresem, by w końcowej części artykułu ująć fenomen twarzy w języku nowej fenomenologii.

Refine search results

1 Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies

1 Logos i Ethos

1 Drwięga M.

1 Grzegorzewska M.

1 2019

1 2016

Search results

That which Cannot be Said: My Flesh and the Face of the Other in the Poetry of John Donne

Fenomenologia i twarz innego. Kontrowersje wokół Lévinasa