Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  scientific production
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Considering the expansion process which the sport sociology is facing in the Social Sciences and Physical Education fields, this study highlights the need to attribute to a specific area of knowledge a diagnosis treatment and the discussion of the sociological matters and conceptions emerging in sport. Also we included in this scenario the preliminary need detected in studies focused on the diagnosis of sport sociology in Brazil. The main goal of this research consists in the diagnosis of the papers that make reference to the sport sociology and to verify the consolidation, in the undergraduate and postgraduate area of this research field in Brazil. Specifically, we aim to localize the authors, their production, theoretical references and analysis models to codify a theoretical and methodological classification of the area, identifying conceptions, perspectives and study objects. We also attempt to make possible the structuring of an Excellence Centre in Sport Sociology studies in Brazil and the possible institutional exchange with Portuguese and Spanishspeaking countries, in Latin America. Part of this project is being accomplished by the creation of the Asociación Latinoamericana de Estudios Socioculturales Del Deporte - ALESDE. The methodology selected is a historic-descriptive research with an analytical-bibliographical character. The scope to this diagnosis will depend on the initial contacts with the productions, however we estimate a possible starting point in the 1950s. Through a preliminary study, we realized the mapping of two journals, one from Sociology and another from Physical Education, collecting data of the papers, such as: authors, theoretical approach, study objects and productions profile, from 1997 to 2007. As the results to this specific research we pointed out the absence of papers published in the Social Sciences journal. This may be the result of disputes and tensions of the academic field, considering issues as research legitimacy, prestige, and the superficiality of the papers submitted for publication, that does not attend the criteria of the referred journal. In the Physical Education journal the sport is a study object with insert, fact confirmed by the number of papers published. However, we noticed a large number of issues of this journal without any publication from Sport Sociology, which can be a symptom of a field in a consolidation process. Based on these indicatives we noticed that the papers we analyzed indicate a lack of a proper appropriation of the sociological theories to discuss, with the proper depth, the study object. These data allow us to elaborate a conception of the Sport Sociology as a field seeking its consolidation and autonomy in Sociology and in Physical Education. By this preliminary study and the wider research we present in this paper, we expect to fill a visible gap in the Sport Sociology studies and contribute in the consolidation of this research field.
EN
Background. Over the last few decades, capoeira has been highlighted as one of the most fascinating human activities. Parallel to the growing number of practitioners worldwide, capoeira has increasingly been the focus of academic concerns, particularly in university contexts. Problem and aim. This study aimed to identify how capoeira has been addressed academically. For this purpose, it sought to develop a bibliometric analysis of published articles on capoeira over the last decade. Material and methods. 353 articles written in the Portuguese, English, Spanish and French languages were identified in the Pubmed (n = 27), Web of Science (n = 176), and Scopus (n = 150) databases, from 2010 to 2020, using the word “capoeira”. After that, 227 articles were removed because they were repeated, with unavailable access or dealt with another matter, resulting in 126 records for analysis. They were analysed based on the relative frequency of occurrences considering: (i) area of knowledge, (ii) authorship, (iii) type of research, and (iv) journal. Results. The articles on capoeira belonged in the disciplines of Social Sciences, Life Sciences and Biomedicine, and Arts and Humanities. The most frequent subareas were Sport Science, Education Educational Research, Hospitality Leisure Sport Tourism, and Social Sciences Interdisciplinary. The main journals were : Movimento, Archives of Budo, Ido Movement for Culture, Revista de Artes Marciales Asiaticas, and Periferia. Qualitative research was the method most utilised. Furthermore, most articles were published in co-authorship, which involved authors from different institutions from the same and different countries. Conclusions. These findings contribute to clarifying the state of research into the set of capoeira and as an important step for the researcher to raise questions, select research methods and define publication targets.
PL
Wprowadzenie. W ciągu ostatnich kilku dekad capoeira stała się jedną z ciekawszych sportowych aktywności. Równolegle do rosnącej liczby adeptów na całym świecie, capoeira jest coraz częściej przedmiotem zainteresowania akademickiego, szczególnie w kontekście uniwersyteckim. Problem i cel. Niniejsze badanie miało na celu określenie, w jaki sposób capoeira została potraktowana akademicko. W tym celu starano się opracować analizę bibliometryczną opublikowanych artykułów na temat capoeiry w ciągu ostatniej dekady. Materiał i metody. W bazach danych Pubmed (n = 27), Web of Science (n = 176) i Scopus (n = 150), od 2010 do 2020 roku, przy użyciu słowa “capoeira” zostały zidentyfikowane 353 artykuły napisane w języku portugalskim, angielskim, hiszpańskim i francuskim. Następnie usunięto 227 artykułów, ponieważ powtarzały się, były niedostępne lub dotyczyły innego zagadnienia, co dało 126 artykułów do analizy. Zostały one przeanalizowane na podstawie względnej częstotliwości występowania, biorąc pod uwagę: (i) obszar wiedzy, (ii) autorstwo, (iii) rodzaj badań oraz (iv) czasopismo. Wyniki. Artykuły na temat capoeiry należały do nauk społecznych, nauk przyrodniczych i biomedycyny oraz sztuki i nauk humanistycznych. Najczęstszymi poddziedzinami były nauki o sporcie, edukacja, badania edukacyjne, turystyka sportowa i interdyscyplinarne nauki społeczne. Movimento, Archives of Budo, Ido Movement for Culture, Revista de Artes Marciales Asiaticas i Periferia były głównymi czasopismami. Najczęściej stosowaną metodą były badania jakościowe. Większość artykułów została opublikowana we współautorstwie, w którym uczestniczyli autorzy z różnych instytucji z tego samego i różnych krajów. Wnioski. Wyniki te przyczyniają się do wyjaśnienia stanu badań nad capoeirą, co jest ważnym krokiem dla badacza w celu postawienia pytań, wyboru metod badawczych i określenia celu publikacji
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.