Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  self-protection
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
PL
W niniejszej pracy zajmujemy się problemem wyboru prawnika poprzez zastosowanie modelu stanowiącego połączenie samoubezpieczenia i prewencji (SICP) w sytuacji możliwości zwrotu kosztów w razie wygranej sprawy w sądzie. Jako pierwsi zagadnienie badali Sevi i Yafil (2005) jednak tylko w kontekście prewencji, co oznacza wprowadzenie dodatkowego założenia, że wielkość poniesionej straty jest stała niezależnie od poniesionych kosztów. W tej pracy uogólniamy wynik Sevi i Yafila dowodząc, że założenie o stałych stratach jest nieistotne. Wykazujemy że wzrost awersji do ryzyka powoduje spadek inwestycji w usługi prawne, których koszty mogą być zwrócone w razie wygranej sprawy w sądzie, co jak wiadomo, nie jest prawdą w standardowych modelach prewencji i SICP. Ponadto interpretujemy ten wynik za pomocą pojęcia ryzykowności w sensie Rothschilda-Stiglitza. Dowodzimy, że wzrost inwestycji w SICP powoduje wzrost ryzykowności związanej z bogactwem końcowym. W konsekwencji osoby bardziej niechętne ryzyku decydują się na zmniejszenie poziomu inwestycji w zrekompensowane SICP.
EN
We consider decision about the choice of a lawyer as a particular case of self-insurance-cum-protection when the lawyer's cost is repaid in case of victory. The problem was introduced by Sevi and Yafil (2005) in the context of self-protection, which requires assumption that the size of loss does not depend on effort (level of the expenditure on lawyer). In this paper we drop that assumption and our model includes possibility that both loss and probability of incurring a loss depend on effort. We prove that unlike the standard cases of SP and SICP, the level of effort is monotone in risk aversion. We interpret and explain the result in terms of mean-preserving spread and increasing riskiness in the sense of Rothschild-Stiglitz. We prove that increase in SICP with indemnity leads to increased riskiness of the utility of final wealth. As a consequence, the more risk-averse individual is, the less she invests in legal expenses.
EN
The aim of the study was to identify, during guided imageries, how high and low self-critical people imagine their inner self-critical, selfprotective, and self-compassionate parts. The authors explored changes in imagery content when comparing the pre-test and post-test state of Emotion Focused Training for Self-Compassion and Self-Protection (EFT-SCP). Consensual Qualitative Research was the method used for the data analysis and level of self-criticism was determined using the Forms of Self-Criticizing/ Attacking and Self-Reassuring Scale. Two groups representing the extremes of the sample of 92 EFT-SCP adolescent participants (the highest 15% and the lowest 15% of the selfcritics) were analysed. The first of the two extreme groups consisted of 12 highly self-critical people (1 man and 11 women, AM = 21.7; SD = 1.16), and the second comprised 15 low selfcritics (1 man and 14 women; AM = 22.3; SD = 1.2). The results indicated that the training led to positive shifts away from maladaptive patterns (shame, fear, worthlessness, and incompetence) to more adaptive ones (safeness, love, empowerment, and the need to understand the situation). Although the maladaptive patterns declined and adaptive ones were adopted, the maladaptive patterns were not completely eliminated, which can be exploited in better use of treatments.
EN
The term self-handicapping (SH) refers to the phenomenon when, under certain conditions, individuals characterized by certain personality factors hinder their success by self-imposed obstacles in important performance situations. The study starts with an accurate definition of SH that is then placed in the context of psychological theories and related social psychological concepts. Two distinct forms of SH, namely, behavioural and self-reported handicaps are discussed in detail. The factors influencing SH are categorized and analysed according to two dimensions, that is, personal versus environmental and eliciting versus preventive factors. Questionnaire and experimental techniques of measuring SH are presented. The summary evaluates existing theoretical and empirical research and discusses the issues of practical application, difficulties of research and relevant topics that need to be further investigated.
CS
Termín sebeznevýhodňování označuje jev, kdy za určitých podmínek jednotlivci charakterizovaní určitými osobnostními faktory si brání v úspěchu v důležitých výkonových situacích dobrovolně přijímanými překážkami. Studie vychází z přesné definice sebeznevýhodňování, která je zařazena do kontextu psychologických teorií a příbuzných sociálně psychologických pojmů. Podrobně jsou probrány dvě odlišné formy sebeznevýhodňování, behaviorální a sebevýpověďová. Faktory ovlivňující sebeznevýhodňování jsou kategorizovány a analyzovány ve dvou rozměrech, osobním versus environmentálním, a vyvolávajícím versus preventivním. Jsou uvedeny jak dotazník, tak experimentální techniky měření sebeznevýhodňování. Ve shrnutí jsou zhodnoceny existující teorie a empirické výzkumy a probrána témata praktických aplikací, výzkumné problémy a relevantní náměty, které by měly být dále zkoumány.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.