Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 5

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  sexuate difference
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
In this text Luce Irigaray enquires into questions pertaining to knowledge production, contemporarily derivative upon capitalist system of production and the ideology promoting sexual/gender neutrality, along with corporeal/bodily, class-related, and cultural non-differentiation. According to the female philosopher, the said system contributes to exploitation of not only human work, but most of all energy that fuels our ability to bond and be together. Therefore, going back to the most fundamental structure of human subjectivity determined by the sexuate difference, may prove to be not only a strategic resistance device meted out against capitalist organisation of work, but also a path leading to another world, where a coexistence acknowledging mutual/reciprocal difference may appear possible.
EN
In the present article the author endeavours to compare the main assumptions of Italian post-operaist feminism (mostly those related to the Wages for Housework campaign) with Luce Irigaray’s sexuate difference philosophy. Assuming as a departure point the notion of labour force reproduction, the author tries to prove the synergic potential sustaining between the two mentioned perspectives – the most noteworthy convergence between them is the eventually shared ontological horizon stemming from Marx’s perspective on communism as “the real movement which abolishes the present state of things.”
3
100%
EN
The text aims at outlining a new concept of democracy that is based on respecting differences, starting with sexuate difference which – according to Luce Irigaray – makes up a foundation for human individuation. Drawing upon philosophical and political democracy models originating in ancient Greece, Irigaray unmasks their exclusion-based character, proving that they are incapable of facilitating a culture filled with respect for differences amongst citizens regardless of their sex/gender. Luce Irigaray proposes that a new democratic model is required, the one that would include democracy’s most profound facet, namely – human subjectivity.
EN
This article’s aim is an attempt at discussing the notion of reproductive work/labour pondered over by female representatives of Italian autonomism and alsoeminent in Luce Irigaray’s philosophy. By pointing to the said relationship between Irigaray’s thought and Italian feminist movements, the author indicates the missing link in feminist historiography, referring feminist thought back to the origins of Marxist philosophy. Following the trail of thought of both the feminist female theoreticians and Luce Irigaray, the author proves that through regaining the significance of reproductive work/labour playing crucial role in patriarchal-capitalist economy, it is actually possible to redefine the gender distribution of labour/work based on exploitation of women in economic, social, political, and cultural dimension. Putting sexuate difference to the eponymous work would, therefore, involve intertwining those two programmes: Irigaray’s philosophy and Italian autonomism, accompanied by a political programme per se, which would transform social relations between men and women,thereby creating new worlds and new relations. 
Praktyka Teoretyczna
|
2017
|
vol. 25
|
issue 3
342-353
EN
The article presents a critical reading of traditional psychoanalysis from the perspective introduced by Gilles Deleuze, Fèlix Guattari and Luce Irigaray in their early works. Despite significant differences noticeable within their thought, it is interesting to compare two fundamental books, Anti-Oedipus (1972) and Speculum (1974), in order to emphasize the point of convergence, notably the reformulation of the oedipal triangle through releasing desire from the normative process of oedipalization.
PL
Niniejszy tekst stanowi próbę krytycznej lektury tradycyjnej psychoanalizy w perspektywie założeń zaprezentowanych przez Gilles’a Deleuze’a i Fèlixa Guattariego oraz Luce Irigaray. Zestawiając dwie wczesne prace myślicieli, Anty-Edypa (1972) i Speculum (1974), pomimo dzielących je różnic, można zaobserwować wiele punktów wspólnych, a jednym z nich jest próba przeformułowania trójkąta edypalnego poprzez uwolnienie pragnienia z ram normalizującej edypalizacji.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.