Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  skrócenie kadencji parlamentu
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Uprawnienia hamujące Prezydenta Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej wobec legislatywy w Konstytucji Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z 1997 roku

100%
Ścibor W.
Biuletyn Stowarzyszenia Absolwentów i Przyjaciół Wydziału Prawa Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego
|
2023
|
vol. 18
|
issue 20 (1)
195-206
EN
The article aims to analyze the position of the head of state and his powers of an inhibitory nature against the legislature. The paper presents the conditions for the President of the Republic of Poland to use the mechanism of shortening the term of parliament, filing a legislative veto and applying to the Constitutional Court for a preventive constitutionality review. The article analyzes the powers that the President has vis-à-vis the legislature and the actions it takes, as well as his role as an arbiter in a crisis situation in the chambers of parliament. The rationale and limitations on the use of inhibitory powers by the head of state against the legislature are discussed. In drafting this article, the dogmatic-legal method was used to analyze the effectiveness of the post-1997 application of the powers vested in the President against the legislature.
PL
Artykuł ma na celu analizę pozycji głowy państwa i jego uprawnień o charakterze hamującym wobec legislatywy. W pracy przedstawione zostały warunki skorzystania przez Prezydenta RP z mechanizmu skrócenia kadencji parlamentu, zgłoszenia weta ustawodawczego oraz zwrócenia się do Trybunału Konstytucyjnego z wnioskiem o przeprowadzenie prewencyjnej kontroli konstytucyjności. W artykule dokonana została analiza uprawnień, które posiada Prezydent wobec władzy ustawodawczej i podejmowanych przez nią działań, a także jego roli arbitra w sytuacji kryzysu w izbach parlamentu. Omówione zostały przesłanki oraz ograniczenia dotyczące stosowania przez głowę państwa uprawnień hamujących wobec legislatywy. Podczas sporządzenia niniejszego artykułu wykorzystano metodę dogmatyczno-prawną celem przeprowadzenia analizy skuteczności stosowania po 1997 r. przysługujących Prezydentowi kompetencji wobec władzy ustawodawczej.
2

Differentia specifica ustawy budżetowej według Konstytucji Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z 1997 r.

70%
Kowalski G.
Roczniki Wydziału Nauk Prawnych i Ekonomicznych KUL
|
2005
|
vol. 1
|
issue 1 Prawo
109-143
EN
According to Polish constitution the Budget act is one of acts in genere. Nonetheless some features of the Budget act (also mini-budget act) which differ it from the other acts make this act special, clearly differing it from the others. The differences between usual acts and the Budget act concern, most of all, legislative procedure. Firstly, the Budget bill may be submitted into the Sejm only by the Cabinet. Secondly, passing this bill and submitting it for President's approval should occur within four months since submitting the bill to the Sejm. Otherwise, President may shorten the term of parliament. Thirdly, the Senate has only twenty, instead of thirty, days to examine the Budget act handed over by the Sejm. The Senate can't reject the Budget act as well. Fourthly, President has only seven, instead of twenty one, days to sign the act and he hasn't the power of veto (he can't veto this act). Fifthly, Constitutional Tribunal has only two months to pass a sentence on the Budget act accord with constitution. The Budget act has also exceptional content which determines as with content of many other acts and execution of their regulations, so with activity of governing body, especially executive one which executes the Budget act. The way in which execution of the Budget act is controlled is different as well. Controlling execution of the Budget act, the Sejm also controls simultaneously the Cabinet which is responsible for executing the Budget act. Moreover, not every regulation of the Budget act has general and abstract character which is typical for acts regulations. Finally, the Budget act is always passed for time determined by constitution in advance, that is for budgetary year which is the same as calendar year. Exceptionally it may go to effects for shorter time than budgetary year (mini-budget act). All those differences weigh in favour of treating the Budget act as a sui generis act. Nevertheless they don't justify treating the Budget act as a source of law different from other acts. In other words, the Budget act has the same force of law as other acts, occupying the same position in hierarchy of law sources.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.