Results found: 2

Search results

Search:
in the keywords: sociologie politiky

Sort By:

Limit search:

Jak měřit stranickou identifikaci?

100%

Linek L.

Data a výzkum - SDA Info (Data and Research - SDA Info)

2009

vol. 3

issue 2

187-210

This study has two key aims. First, it explores the two main methods used in the Czech Republic to operationalize the concept of party identification. Second this study demonstrates the merits of both methods; and on the basis of this research proposes one of these party identification measures for use in future studies. This study builds on the classical conceptualization of party identification developed by the Michigan School, but also utilizes (1) reformulations proposed by the Revisionist School; (2) Macropartisanship theory; (3) the Social Identity approach; and (4) experience of using the party identification measure in Europe. Using the Czech Election Study of 2002 this research shows that estimates of partisanship are influenced by how the survey question is formulated. Thereafter, the relationship between the two main variants used in the Czech Republic is presented. This work reveals that use of a (prior) vote intention item leads to an ‘over estimation’ of partisanship when compared to the other partisan measure. Comparing estimates from the Czech Election Studies of 1996, 2002 and 2006 this article reveals that there is no simple association between party identification and voter turnout. In fact, it is better to think of party identification as having two components: (a) probability to vote; and (b) probability to support a party that elicits a sense of identity from voters.

Měření politických znalostí

80%

Lyons P.

Data a výzkum - SDA Info (Data and Research - SDA Info)

2007

vol. 1

issue 2

109-125

This article examines ways to measure political knowledge. The main premise of most works in a given field is the idea that political knowledge is a characteristic that belongs only to individuals. The research on which this text is based assumes that political knowledge is a characteristic of both individuals and ways of measuring that knowledge. The analyzes are based on a battery of questions on political knowledge, which was implemented in the ISSP survey The Role of Government IV (2006). This article demonstrates that the assumption of one-dimensionality of political knowledge must not be taken for granted and must be tested. The presence of more than one dimension of political knowledge is theoretically important, as it implies that some citizens are only interested in specific aspects of politics. This has important implications for our understanding and evaluation of the democratic system of government.

Tento článek zkoumá způsoby měření politických znalostí. Hlavním předpokladem většiny prací v daném oboru je myšlenka, že politické znalosti jsou charakteristikou, která náleží pouze jedinci. Výzkum, na němž je založen tento text, předpokládá, že politické znalosti jsou charakteristikou jak jedinců, tak způsobů měření těchto znalostí. Analýzy jsou založené na baterii otázek na politické znalosti, jež byla implementována v šetření ISSP Role vlády IV (2006). Tento článek demonstruje, že předpoklad jednodimenzionality politických znalostí nesmí být chápán jako daný a musí být naopak testován. Přítomnost více než jedné dimenze politických znalostí je teoreticky důležitá, neboť implikuje, že někteří občané se zajímají pouze o specifické aspekty politiky. To má významné důsledky pro naše chápání a hodnocení demokratického systému vládnutí.

Refine search results

2 Data a výzkum - SDA Info (Data and Research - SDA Info)

1 Linek L.

1 Lyons P.

1 2009

1 2007

Search results

Jak měřit stranickou identifikaci?

Měření politických znalostí