Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 10

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  statement
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

K Heideggerově koncepci výpovědi a pravdy

100%
EN
This paper contributes to the discussion of Heidegger’s conception of statement which rejects the classical understanding of it as being the automatic place of truth and reveals it to be a phenomenon rooted in much deeper hermeneutical and, above all, temporal structures. The article systematises Heidegger’s conception of the three conditions for the untruthfulness of a statement in relation to its primary, that is apophantic, function. The conclusion is a fundamentally ontological conception of the statement which can be applied to the traditional dispute between Russell and Strawson about the statement the current king of France is bald. Fundamental ontology also reveals how the starting point of this dispute is incorrect. If one had to say that one said was right, however, truth would be closer to Russell and not to Strawson, as it is generally thought nowadays.
EN
The tendency in researching language stylistics is that researchers rather start from a certain style and assign language properties to it, including syntactic ones. In the presented article, which is based on the model of functional syntax (Kiklewicz 1999; 2004), the author suggests an opposite research perspective, that is analysis of stylistic properties of specific kinds of syntactic structures. Being completion of the former description rule this research suggestion contributes to a comprehensive presentation of language competence where stylistic markedness of language units constitutes an important aspect. For this reason and due to isolation of categorical content of the function, scope of its meaning and reference the suggestion depicted is so helpful in comparing languages.
3
Content available remote

Norma prawna: wyrażenie czy wypowiedź?

75%
EN
Opting for the linguistic concept which dominates Polish legal theory does not eliminate all doubts about comprehension of legal norms. The aim of the article is to determine whether such norms should be perceived as expressions or statements. It would seem that, except for improving conceptual apparatus, this problem is of no considerable significance. Nevertheless, finding a solution to it would allow us to address many other important issues. The recognition of the legal norm as a statement would make it possible to: coherently arrange the links existing between a lawmaking action and its substrata at different levels, specify in detail relations between a legal provision and a legal norm, define what functions are played by validating rules and rules of exegesis in legal system construction, resolve a dispute on whether systemic nature is an immanent or transcendent characteristic of law, and also address the issue of equivalence of legal norm.
5
Content available remote

Mówi Świetlicki

63%
PL
Artykuł zatytułowany Mówi Świetlicki dotyczy czasu, w którym uznany poeta – Marcin Świetlicki – przełamuje wielokrotnie deklarowaną niechęć do używania mediów społecznościowych. Na przełomie lat 2014 i 2015 zaczyna regularnie publikować „odezwy” do swoich fanów. Początkowo teksty te dotyczą odmowy nominacji do Nagrody Literackiej Nike, stopniowo jednak zakres poruszanych tematów znacznie się poszerza. Świetlicki, przez lata uznawany za piewcę literatury politycznie niezaangażowanej, zaczyna wyraźnie i często mówić o sprawach bieżących – nie tylko w swoich książkach, ale także na stronach portalu Facebook.
EN
The article entitled “Świetlicki speaking” referes to the time when the well-recognized poet, Marcin Świetlicki, repeatedly breaks his declared unwillingness to use the social media. At the turn of 2014 and 2015 he begins to publish “appeals” to his fans. Initially, these texts concern the refusal of nomination to the literary reward Nike, but gradually the scope of the topics expands. Świetlicki, for years considered a politically disengaged poet, begins to speak often and clearly on current issues – not only in his books, but also on Facebook.
EN
The proposition I elucidate and defend in this paper is that the explanatory power of Malgorzata Czarnocka’s conception of symbolic truth extends beyond our knowledge of empirical reality and includes our knowledge of human nature and human values. The paper is composed of two parts. In the first part I present a detailed analysis of the con- ception of symbolic truth. The focus in this analysis is on the nature of the correspond- ence relation which connects a true statement and the cognitive object. Czarnocka per- suasively argues that this relation is neither isomorphic nor homomorphic in character. She advances a detailed analysis of sensual perception as the locus of the cognitive act. The outcome of this analysis is that the structure of the statement which is articulated in this act does not copy or mirror the structure of the object but is a linguistic representa- tion. In the second part of the paper I argue that empirical reality is not the paradigm of reality and that scientific knowledge is not the paradigm of knowledge. The domain of humanity is as real as the domain of empirical reality, and our knowledge of this domain is as central to our life as scientific knowledge is. Moreover, I argue that Czar- nocka’s conception of symbolic truth functions adequately in explaining the possibility of knowledge of human nature and human values with special focus on the literary work of art.
7
63%
Eruditio et Ars
|
2022
|
vol. 5
|
issue 2
105-113
EN
A statement formulated by a speaker carries a plenitude of information. A number of these pieces of information is located in the segmental layer - the contents of the statement. Other pieces of information are contained in the suprasegmental layer. When delivering a statement we are not always sure what part of it consists of non-speaking. Admittedly, we think only of what we want to say and not of the non-verbal components which make delivering a statement possible. This paper presents one of the research problems tackled within the framework of a doctoral dissertation concerning the rate of children’s speech.
PL
Wypowiedź formułowana przez nadawcę niesie za sobą liczne informacje. Szereg z nich mieści się w jej warstwie segmentalnej – treści komunikatu. Kolejne zawiera także warstwa suprasegmentalna wypowiedzi. Realizując wypowiedź, nie zawsze mamy świadomość, jaką jej część stanowi niemówienie. Myślimy przecież wyłącznie o tym, co chcemy powiedzieć, nie o składnikach, które w niemy sposób nam to umożliwiają. Artykuł zawiera dokładne dane, poparte wynikami badań autorskich, dotyczące procentowego udziału „mówienia” i „niemówienia” w wypowiedziach dziecięcych.
8
51%
PL
Artykuł dotyczy języka używanego przez prokuratorów, który pojawia się w zeznaniach świadków w trakcie przesłuchania na sali sądowej. Autorka dokonała porównania języka użytego przez świadka i języka użytego przez prokuratora (m.in. w mowie oskarżyciela). Będąc biegłym sądowym, powołanym do dokonania analizy języka użytego przez świadka, autorka wyciąga wniosek, że z dużym prawdopodobieństwem wpływ na język, jakim posługiwał się świadek miały spotkania z prokuratorem, które odbyły się tuż przed rozprawą. Język świadka zawierał cechy języka prokuratora oraz cechy języka pisanego, które pokrywają się z konstrukcjami zawartymi w analizowanych dokumentach.
EN
This paper discusses the characteristics of prosecutor’s language that would appear in the prosecution witness’s answers during direct examination. I performed a linguistic comparison of the language that is used in a witness’s answers against that of five relevant documents, which include a prosecutor’s opening statement, a prosecutor’s final statement, 11 samples of suspect’s statements from the handbook for investigating officers and one from witness’s personal letters. I would like to argue that as the witness’s answer had the features of a prosecutor’s language as well as written language, the prosecutor’s ten meetings with the witness immediately before the trial may have possibly influenced not only the witness’s language but also the content of the testimony itself. The analysis of this paper is based upon my expert witness opinion that was submitted to the Tokyo High Court and Japanese Supreme Court for the case in question.
EN
The article presents the characteristics of interviewing persons who witnessed an aircraft accident, as well as procedures of obtaining information from them by members of Commissions investigating the accident, and officials conducting preparatory proceedings. In order to illustrate the role and significance of the interviews, the Authors include examples of employing witnesses’ testimonies in the reconstruction of the course of flight during which an accident took place, and determination of causes and circumstances of its occurrence.
PL
W artykule przedstawiono specyfikę przesłuchań osób będących świadkami wypadku lotniczego oraz pozyskiwania od nich informacji przez członków komisji badających wypadek oraz funkcjonariuszy prowadzących postępowania przygotowawcze. W celu zilustrowania roli i znaczenia przesłuchań w tekście zaprezentowano kilka przykładów wykorzystania zeznań świadków do odtworzenia przebiegu lotu, podczas którego doszło do wypadku, oraz określenia przyczyn i okoliczności jego zaistnienia.
EN
The paper draws upon so-called disscusive logic which does not refute the principle of contradiction directly, but accepts contradicting statements of different parties of the discourse or of the same subject but in different time. On the ground of recentivism every statement contrary to the system is sifted through the axiology of the system in a recentiori mode. That is, it is rejected by the system just as it falls into contradiction in the moment of being expressed (sermo). In short: the moment of expression eliminates contradiction in the content, for according to recentivist epistemology the description of an event is not true or false in general, but in the present time only and it changes its truthfulness with the time.
DE
Der Artikel knüpft an sog. Diskussionslogik an, die den Satz vom Widerspruch nicht direkt ablehnt, sondern stattdessen widersprüchliche, von verschiedenen Diskutanten oder von derselben Person, aber zu anderer Zeit geäußerten Meinungen zulässt. Wird der Standpunkt in rezentivistischen Kategorien betrachtet, so heißt er: jede systemwidrige Meinung wird mittels Axiologie des Systems a recentiori ausgewählt, und das bedeutet, dass sie das rezentivistische System verlässt, sobald sie sich während der Äußerung (sermo) mit der Aussage in Widerspruch verwickelt. Kurz gesagt: die Zeit der Aussage behebt den im Gegenstand der Aussage steckenden Widerspruch. Es folgt aus der Epistemologie des Rezentivismus, laut der die Beschreibung eines Ereignisses nicht im allgemeinen, sondern nur in der Gegenwart richtig ist, und nur samt der Gegenwart unterliegt sie einer Änderung hinsichtlich ihrer momentanen Richtigkeit.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.