Search results

1

The Commentary on the Supreme Court’s Judgment of 8 February 2017, III KK 226/16, LEX No. 2224610

100%

Budyn-Kulik M.

Studia Iuridica Lublinensia

|

2017

|

vol. 26

|

issue 2

EN

The verdict deals with a matter of a relationship between guilt and subjective side of a crime. The author of a comment criticizes the thesis that in a normative theory of a guilt the possibility of prescribing a proper kind of a subjective side of a crime does not influence a guilt. A doctor guarantees that a fatal effect does not appear. The law demands that he/she must behave with respect to rules of safety.

PL

Wyrok dotyczy kwestii wzajemnej relacji winy oraz strony podmiotowej. Autorka glosy krytycznie odnosi się do stwierdzenia, że w teorii normatywnej winy możliwość przypisania odpowiedniej postaci strony podmiotowej nie ma wpływu na przypisanie winy. Lekarz jest gwarantem nienastąpienia skutku w postaci śmierci pacjenta. Wymaga się od niego zachowania ostrożnego w danych okolicznościach.

2

Zasada winy - uwagi na tle polskiego kodeksu karnego

84%

Komadowska A.

Roczniki Wydziału Nauk Prawnych i Ekonomicznych KUL

|

2009

|

vol. 5

|

issue 1 Prawo

57-67

EN

Guilt, besides punishability and culpability, constitutes an element of the definition of a crime. Scientific literature broadly describes problems pertaining to the essence of guilt and it creates its definitions. However, there is no agreement in this respect and a few more important theories of guilt have been put forward. The 1997 code for the first time introduced the declaration of guilt and the solutions about guilt which principally differ from the previous ones. The Author of the present paper makes an attempt to get a closer look at the problem of guilt, its importance for penal liability as well as trying to point out which solutions concerning the perpetrator’s guilt have been adopted in the present code.

3

Zasada winy - uwagi na tle polskiego kodeksu karnego

84%

Komadowska A.

Roczniki Wydziału Nauk Prawnych i Ekonomicznych KUL

|

2009

|

vol. 5

|

issue 1

57-67

EN

Guilt, besides punishability and culpability, constitutes an element of the definition of a crime. Scientific literature broadly describes problems pertaining to the essence of guilt and it creates its definitions. However, there is no agreement in this respect and a few more important theories of guilt have been put forward. The 1997 code for the first time introduced the declaration of guilt and the solutions about guilt which principally differ from the previous ones. The Author of the present paper makes an attempt to get a closer look at the problem of guilt, its importance for penal liability as well as trying to point out which solutions concerning the perpetrator’s guilt have been adopted in the present code.

4

Glosa do wyroku SA w Lublinie z dnia 30 listopada 2016 r., II AKa 242/16, LEX nr 2188879

67%

Budyn-Kulik M.

Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, sectio G (Ius)

|

2017

|

vol. 64

|

issue 1

EN

The verdict deals with a kind of subjective side of a crime. The author criticizes the thesis that a court can settle it only because of a level of wrongdoers’ consciousness. It also demands a certain knowledge of volitional sphere. The verdict also deals with a possibility of using the institution of the so-called active remorse; the Court mistakenly associates it with the degree of an attempt development (unfinished attempt – finished attempt).

PL

Wyrok sądu dotyczy ustalenia postaci strony podmiotowej. Autorka glosy krytycznie odnosi się do tezy, że wystarczy tu samo ustalenie stanu świadomości oskarżonego. Przypisanie sprawcy zamiaru wymaga również poczynienia odpowiednich stwierdzeń co do sfery wolicjonalnej. Wyrok odnosi się także do możliwości skorzystania z tzw. instytucji czynnego żalu, błędnie uzależniając ją od stopnia zaawansowania usiłowania (usiłowanie ukończone – usiłowanie nieukończone).

Refine search results

2 Roczniki Wydziału Nauk Prawnych i Ekonomicznych KUL

1 Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, sectio G (Ius)

1 Studia Iuridica Lublinensia

2 Budyn-Kulik M.

2 Komadowska A.

2 2017

2 2009

The Commentary on the Supreme Court’s Judgment of 8 February 2017, III KK 226/16, LEX No. 2224610

Zasada winy - uwagi na tle polskiego kodeksu karnego

Zasada winy - uwagi na tle polskiego kodeksu karnego

Glosa do wyroku SA w Lublinie z dnia 30 listopada 2016 r., II AKa 242/16, LEX nr 2188879