Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  symbolic field
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Die Interjektionen im Deutschen und Arabischen aus funktional-pragmatischer Sicht

100%
Fouad L.
Studia Translatorica
|
2019
|
issue 10
265-279
EN
Interjections are an essential part of communication. They have their own phonological inventory and fulfil special communicative functions. They put interactional procedures in process. In the past, they used to be treated only as a secondary category, but they received a special position in the new linguistic approach of functional pragmatics. They have an interesting scientific history of development in Arabic too, starting from the Kufa-School of grammar until the modern theories. This paper discusses the interjections as a grammatical category in German and Arabic.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

The Limits of Representation and What Lies Beneath

72%
Leder A.
Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture
|
2022
|
vol. 6
|
issue 1
65-79
EN
This article attempts to demonstrate that the failure to recognize real conflicts and bring them to representation is the chief yet highly inconspicuous reason behind the regression of ways in which we understand and describe today’s reality. Crucially, this shortcoming has helped to elevate the language of economics to the rank of the basic idiom for the development of mutual representations. As my analyses show, the language of economy has become the principal medium of representation for communities separated by great distances and unable to recognize each other’s existence as rooted in their respective realities, despite the fact that they are deeply interconnected. For this reason, although global dependence and conflict, including exploitation and exclusion, remain faceless, they do find some expression in symbolic indices of anonymous capital flows, represented and made legible in streams of numbers.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Historia i struktura. Problem uprawomocnienia

61%
Leder A.
Praktyka Teoretyczna
|
2016
|
vol. 22
|
issue 4
132-151
EN
In his text the author is defining the conflict of the structuralist and historicist – synchronic and diachronic thought – described by de Saussure–- as a development of two different ethical axioms in the field of social philosophy. He tries to show, how each of this axioms can generate a different ontology of social being. Applying some elements of Deleuzian thought the author analyzes the theoretical position of the two ethical axioms. Then, on the fundament of the Lacanian, and more generally poststructuralist thought he tries to give a draft of a theoretical space in which such a change of ethical positions would be possible. He develops thus a new philosophy of symbolic fields.
PL
Zarysowany przez de Saussure‟a spór pomiędzy myśleniem strukturalistycznym a historycznym autor rozpoznaje jako konflikt zasad etycznych w filozofii społecznej. Pokazuje, jak każda z tych zasad generuje inną ontologię społecznego bytu. Na przykładzie Deleuze‟a rozważa teoretyczne umiejscowienie każdej z tych etycznych pozycji, a potem, w oparciu o myśl poststrukturalistyczną, a szczególnie Lacanowską, próbuje naszkicować teoretyczną przestrzeń, w której takie zmiany pozycji etycznej byłyby możliwe. Wypracowuje w ten sposób pewną filozofię pól symbolicznych.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.