Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 6

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  synthesis of arts
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
This article focuses on the notion of light in chosen dramatic works of Juliusz Słowacki – oneof the most well-known Polish Romantics. The analysis of his literary legacy confirms that he perceivedbrightness not only as a motif, but also as a – purposefully used – theatrical sign. Drama asa literary genre also gave Słowacki a possibility to freely combine tradition and conventions fromthe fields of literature, aesthetics and philosophy, and to include descriptive passages and philosophicalreflections in his writings, which was often the case with his works from the 1840s.
EN
Different types of formal expression can be found in the modern architecture of the 21st century - in publications, internet resources and in the generalizations of critics. In the context of the synthesis of arts the styles of sculptural architecture and surface architecture are noteworthy. Characteristics of this synthesis are also noticeable in kinetic architecture where the styles of surface kinetic architecture and sculptural kinetic architecture are distinguished. The genesis of images of buildings constructed in these styles is the result of the synthesis of arts; it reflects the development of historical styles as well as the ways of formal expression and their influences in the end of the 20th century and in the 21st century. This paper provides an analysis of constructed objects and proposals put forth in architectural competitions in Latvia’s 21st century modern architecture.
EN
The article constitutes a detailed analysis and interpretation of one of the most important texts written at the turn of the twentieth century, which was devoted to the reception and interpretation of Frédéric Chopin’s compositions in the Young Poland period. In his work, Cezary Jellenta presents the nervous perception of the Polish composer’s music typical of the era and refers in his reflections to numerous works of painting and both Polish and world literature, which perfectly illustrates the fascination with the idea of the correspondence of arts. It is also a testimony to the foundations of the emerging music criticism and evidence of the undying adoration for Frédéric Chopin’s works.
EN
The article Chopin’s impulse. Stefan Żeromski’s „Diaries” versus Fryderyk Chopin’s output shows writer’s fascination for Fryderyk Chopin and his work. The main emphasis is put on the strength of influence of particular elements of composition on the neurotic system of Stefan Żeromski. Besides, it touches upon the synthesis of arts which the artist often referred to in his Diaries.
EN
After defining the term synthesis and possible use of this word in the theory of art, the author concentrates on various visions of the „Community of Arts”. Description of the philosophical conception of the primeval syncretistic culture, destroyed by – among the others – partition of art into selected domains introduces the ideas to reconstruct universal art especially in the theatre (e.g. Richard Wagner, theatre reformers at the beginning of the 20th century, happening). Afterwards the author demonstrates the basic artistic elements uniting arts and proper to investigate the synthesis of arts phenomenon. Concentration on an artist, turns the attention not only to multitalented creators but also to a problem of the different or similar ways of expression in various domains (e.g. poetry and painting), as well as to the issue of a „creative impulse”. The artwork constructed in a chosen place and specific time, in one style and with one iconographic program, is the most visible base of the synthesis (e.g. in architecture and applied arts, understood as the cooperation of artists or in the contemporary, transgressive and multimedia installation). The situation indicates also the elementary aesthetic problems of the most common determinant of artistic character of the work and the role of the reception and interpretation by the recipient. This element of an artistic process reminds about the role of the aesthetic experience as the final „common place” of every artistic activity (e. g. represented in the romantic considerations on synaesthesia, in the issue titled „ut pictura poesis” or in the „fusion of horizons” conception). Finally, the author stresses the role of recipient’s intellectual activity and cognition as the necessary element and the proper space of the synthesis of arts. The text ends with the reflection about the advantages of the investigations of the synthesis problems for the general questions concerning the art.
EN
The article analyses the image of the first Russian Emperor created in Gavrila Derzhavin’s poetry, from the early poems of the 1770s to the late works written during the Patriotic War of 1812. Only some of the poems directly address Peter and his epoch. Mostly, the image of Peter I is auxiliary and in terms of the correlation of image and idea – usually emblematic. References to the tsar often correlate with reconstructing the stylistic context of Mikhail Lomonosov’s poetry, with continuing the formation of a special literary mythology, which presents Peter as a demiurge who created New Russia, and Catherine II as a continuator of his work, sometimes even surpassing her great predecessor in her achievements. In terms of genre, Derzhavin’s works which feature the image of Peter or include stylistically significant references to him, in some cases tend towards the synthesis of arts: musicality (hymn, ode) or ekphrasis. In creating the image of Peter I, the poet relies on the Western European context but also on generic and stylistic achievements of Old Russian literature. Special attention is paid to the poem “On the Prophecy of Simeon of Polotsk and Dmitry of Rostov at the Birth of Peter the Great”, which has not attracted the attention of literary scholars so far.
RU
В статье анализируется образ первого русского императора, созданный в поэзии Г. Р. Державина от ранних стихотворений 1770-х годов до поздних произведений периода Отечественной войны 1812 года. Непосредственно Петру и его эпохе посвящены лишь некоторые из них. В основном образ Петра I носит вспомогательный характер, а в плане соотнесения образа и идеи является, как правило, эмблематическим. Упоминания Петра часто соотносятся с воссозданием стилистического контекста поэзии М. В. Ломоносова, с продолжением формирования особой литературной мифологии, которая рисует Петра как демиурга – творца Новой России, а Екатерину II как продолжательницу его дела, иногда своими свер­шениями даже превосходящую великого предшественника. В жанровом плане произведения Г. Р. Державина, воплощающие образ Петра или включающие стилистически значимые упоминания о нем, в ряде случаев тяготеют к синтезу искусств: музыкальности (гимн, ода), экфрасису. Наряду с западноевропейским контекстом поэт при воплощении образа Петра I пользуется жанрово-стилевыми открытиями древнерусской литературы. Основное место уделено ранее не привлекавшему внимания литературоведов стихотворению На пророчество Симеона Полоцкого и Димитрия Ростовского при рождении Петра Великого.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.