Results found: 2

Search results

Search:
in the keywords: tapping

Sort By:

Limit search:

Rate Limits of Sensorimotor Synchronization

100%

Repp B.

Advances in Cognitive Psychology

2006

vol. 2

issue 2-3

163-181

Empirical evidence for upper and lower rate limits of sensorimotor synchronization (typically, finger tapping with an auditory or visual event sequence) is reviewed. If biomechanical constraints are avoided, the upper rate limit can be as high as 8-10 Hz (sequence event inter-onset intervals of 100-125 ms) with auditory stimuli, but has been found to be less than 2.5 Hz (> 400 ms) with simple visual stimuli (flashes of light). The upper rate limit for auditory stimuli varies with task difficulty and musical experience; that for visual stimuli requires further investigation. The lower rate limit, according to one definition, tends to be at about 0.56 Hz (1800 ms), regardless of modality. Attentional, perceptual, and sensorimotor explanations of these limits are considered. Rate limits of sensorimotor synchronization place important constraints on musical ensemble performance and other forms of rhythmic coordination.

Podmiotowe i przedmiotowe granice stosowania podsłuchu w procesie karnym

58%

Koper R.

Ius Novum

2019

vol. 13

issue 1

26-44

The article discusses the subjective and objective scope of tapping in criminal proceedings. To that end, the author analyses the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure in relation to interception and the recording of communications. The issue of admissibility of applying such a coercive measure is strictly linked with giving consideration to the protection of interests of the administration of justice and to the possibility of interference into the privacy of an individual. Under this thesis, the article aims to balance the contradictory interests so that a compromising solution can be found. It is particularly apparent with respect to the controversial and complex issue of the extension of the limits of tapping. In this scope, the amendments to the Criminal Procedure Code introduced by the Act of 4 February 2011 and by the Act of 11 March 2016 have been analysed and new amendments have been proposed. The opinion is herein presented that going beyond the subjective and objective limits set forth in the relevant court’s decision without a court’s consent should not be admissible.

Refine search results

1 Advances in Cognitive Psychology

1 Ius Novum

1 Koper R.

1 Repp B.

1 2019

1 2006

Search results

Rate Limits of Sensorimotor Synchronization

Podmiotowe i przedmiotowe granice stosowania podsłuchu w procesie karnym