Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  teaching strategies
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Despite the many efforts given by the academe, reading comprehension still one of the most challenging language skills among many learners. Anchor on Cooperative Learn-ing Theory, this qualitative-phenomenological study aimed to determine how the jig-saw reading technique helped the college students improve their reading comprehen-sion, vocabulary words and knowledge of context clues, recalling of prior knowledge, sharing correct information, asking relevant questions, and organizing and summariz-ing ideas. The participants were purposively chosen. Focus Groups Discussion (FGD) was used to obtain information from 20 participants. Thematic analysis presented nine themes with varying frequency of responses and core ideas. It was also found that jigsaw technique had in influenced improving not only the students’ reading compre-hension but also their interpersonal, motivational, critical thinking skills; more so their sense of accountability. However, it was noted that time was as essential element in reading comprehension. It implicates that employment of any reading approach or strategy must always take into account some essential factors; students’ needs, teach-er’s role, students’ progress, and learning environment. Thus, reading teachers should possess compassion and patience to the learners. Reading comprehension, jigsaw technique, teaching strategies Pomimo wielu wysiłków podejmowanych przez nauczycieli, czytanie ze zrozumieniem nadal jest jedną z najtrudniejszych umiejętności językowych wśród wielu uczących się. Oparte na teorii wspólnego uczenia się to badanie jakościowo-fenomenologiczne ma na celu ustalenie, jak bardzo metoda jigsaw pomaga studentom college’u w poprawieniu umiejętności czytania ze zrozumienie, zwiększeniu zapasu słów, znajomości wskazówek kontekstowych, przywoływania wcześniejszej wiedzy, dzielenia się prawidłową informacją oraz organizowania i streszczania pomysłów. Uczestnicy zostali dobrani celowo. Badanie zostało przeprowadzone na grupie fokusowej z 20 osób. Analiza tematyczna pozwoliła na wyodrębnienie dziewięciu tematów ze zmieniającą się częstotliwością odpowiedzi i zasadniczych idei. Stwierdzono również, że metoda jigsaw oddziałała nie tylko na czytanie ze zrozumieniem studentów ale również na ich umiejętności interpersonalne, motywację, myślenie krytyczne, jak również po-czucie odpowiedzialności. Jednak zostało odnotowane znaczenie dla czytania ze zrozumieniem takiego podstawowego elementu jak czas. To oznacza, że przy zastosowaniu którejkolwiek strategii lub podejścia do czytania trzeba wziąć pod uwagę niektóre podstawowe czynniki, takie jak potrzeby studentów, rola nauczyciela, postęp studentów, a także środowisko uczenia się. Zatem osoby nauczający czytania powinny mieć odpowiedni poziom empatii i cierpliwości w stosunku do osób uczących się. Czytanie ze zrozumieniem, metoda jigsaw, strategie nauczania
EN
This paper concerns itself with the interdisciplinary nature of academic didactics as a field of social sciences that uses knowledge and results derived from educational sciences, psychology, philosophy, sociology and didactics specific to particular subjects. It was pointed out that considerations on teaching practices in all scientific disciplines constitute another source of knowledge for the field of academic didactics. The diversity of theoretical and methodological approaches is determined by science-specific and discipline- specific research methodology paradigms, diversified teaching cultures dependent on environmental conditions as well as diversified teaching class patters for students that are often specific to an educational profile. The issue addressed in this paper is whether a single didactic paradigm exists that would unify approaches so different in terms of theory and practice. The paper provides a map of academic didactics paradigms, a description of difficulties related to paradigmatic translations as well as the lack of consent to the multiparadigm approach and issues with interferences and shifts between paradigms. Despite the existing difficulties, the suggestion is made to promote the complementary attitude to various approaches. It is supported by the concept of relations between the assumed academic didactics effects and teaching strategies that lead thereto, which are constituted by different teaching and learning patterns.
EN
Nowadays, one may observe a growing interest in sustainable development as the auspicious way to resolve global civilisation problems (www.undp.org). This leads to the increasing role of proper Education for Sustainable Development (ESD). Although there are many approaches to the strategy of efficient teaching (UNESCO 2012), in times of narrow specialization interdisciplinarity is frequently undervalued (Klein 1990). In this paper, the author brings attention to the question of interdisciplinarity in a broader context: its constantly changing definition, common ground with sustainability, main advantages of such a way of thinking, crucial difficulties, and hints aimed at how to introduce it to one’s own teaching tools. As a case study, the teaching of nanotechnology (Meyer 2001) will be used to provide additional examples, share experiences, and make the connection between theory and practice. The aim is to disseminate the idea of interdisciplinarity as a key to efficient ESD in many domains.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.