The subject of the considerations is Article 110 in connection with the Article 142 paragraph 2 of the Act on Used Electrical and Eectronic Equipment, which should be regarded as a circumventing the principle of refraining from amendmening rules modifying other rules after the vacatio legis period. However the author claims that violation of basic principles of the legislative technique does not constitute a reason to omit certain rules in the consolidated text of an act, because such a text has only an editorial significance. Nevertheless an exception is a situation in which the given rule provision is recognized as legally ineffective. In case of Article 110 of the discussed Act, such situation did not occur, hence it must be held that there was no reason to omit this rule in the consolidated text of the Act
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.