Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 5

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  text interpretation
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Dealing with texts may mean using various research methods. The present paper discusses two such methodological approaches: text analysis and text interpretation. It is concerned, initially theoretically, with the question how these approaches can be explained from the text-linguistics point of view and separated from each other. After that a short text material is used to illustrate the thesis that analyzing and interpreting texts are two different forms of dealing with texts.
PL
The present paper presents a discursive interpretation of legał regulations, understood as a particular delineation of communication between a legislator and the receivers of normative statements. The author shows, that the way of communicating a statement in an interacting community, artificially created by a law, is schematic and happens according to two patterns. While regulating the actions of legał subjects in relations conceming legał obligations, a legislator refers writs to the receivers of normative statements. The writs take a form of categorical statements, composed of indicative sentences as well as they specify the time of establishing and receiving of the act of speech, in deictic temporal setting around a pivot of “here and now”, given by a legislature. In the case of combining legał obligations and interactions of dependence of authority, a statement determining the way of solving a dispute between the subjects of legał obligations (e.g. between an em- ployer and an employee), through subjects of authority (e.g. employment courts), is given in the form of conditional sentences. Temporal setting of events in the statements regulating interactions of dependence of authority, determines projection on the time pivot. Ac- cording to the author, the syntactic organisation of sentences and the temporality alloca- ted as the duration of actions suspended in time are the main grammatical ąualities of the functional marking of legał texts.
EN
This paper focuses on the process of text interpretation. Analysing a text thoroughly and, consequently, showing one’s own ideas of its meaning becomes an artistic process. Hardly surprisingly then, people studying at the Drama Department of Saint Petersburg State Theatre Arts Academy are trained in interpreting texts creatively. So are, however, also the students at the Russian Language Department of University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn. Text-based drama exercises as a means to improve one’s pronunciation of a foreign language is examined by Russian drama academies as a considerable number of their students are foreigners from all over the world. Similar text-based drama exercises, integrating role-playing with articulation practice, are used at the Russian Language Department to train the students’ correct Russian pronunciation.
EN
The article deals with derivation phenomena, receiving a graphic design with the help of a hyphen. Among such composite words binomials – a fusion of composited and complex words, and the holophrasis – the stand out in the contraction of phrases and sentences into some semblance of words. Examples of those and others are today in everyday speech. These constructs implement the potency of a word-formation language system that has already been used in poetic speech. The authors show that word-fusion has migrated into the discourse of the Internet, where it successfully performs several functions: visualizing complex ideas, nominating and evaluating objects, phenomena, situations, events, and concepts; and defining complexes, ultimately indicating certain concepts will eventually merge into a single word because the words in the text have become in some sense conditional.
5
63%
PL
W ujęciu komunikatywistycznym dyskurs to obszar sensów powstałych wskutek interpretacji tekstów, które to sensy pozostają w naszej pamięci i są aktywowane w miarę potrzeb komunikacyjnych. Sensy tworzące dany dyskurs, stanowią swoistą bazę odniesienia – własną logikę. Zatem musimy się nauczyć, jak uczestniczyć w poszczególnych dyskursach. Uwzględniając ogólny cel komunikacyjny i swoistą bazę odniesienia sensu, wyróżniliśmy dyskursy: potoczny, naukowy, urzędowy, publicystyczny i artystyczny, w obrębie których można wyróżniać tematycznie węższe subdyskursy. Teksty tworzone w obrębie poszczególnych dyskursów i subdyskursów mogą mieć formę zarówno werbalną, jak i wizualną. Każdy dyskurs wprowadza odmienne reguły interpretacji, których uczestnik musi się nauczyć. Dyskursy rozwijają się i istnieją we własnych polach interpretacyjnych. Uczestnictwo w dyskursie równocześnie rozszerza i usprawnia jego pole interpretacyjne. Kiedy człowiek nie uczestniczy w danym dyskursie, to z tego dyskursu wypada. Pamiętać trzeba, że ludzie mają różny stopień gotowości uczestniczenia w poszczególnych dyskursach.
EN
Within the communication-based approach, discourse is an area of meanings, which are formed through the interpretation of texts. Those meanings remain in our memory and are active as per communicational needs. The meanings forming a discourse constitute a particular basis for reference, i.e. its own logic. Therefore, one must learn how to participate in specific discourses. In considering the general purpose of communication and the special base of reference of meaning, we identified such discourses as: academic, official, journalistic, and artistic, which one could narrow down to more specific sub-discourses. The texts created within a discourse or sub-discourse may take both verbal and visual forms. Each discourse introduces different rules of interpretation, which a participant must learn. Discourses develop and exist within their own interpretative fields. Participation in a discourse both expands and improves its interpretative field. When a person does not participate in a discourse, they drop out of the discourse altogether. It is worth remembering that people possess various levels of the readiness to participate in specific discourses.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.