Search results

1

Pierre Bourdieu on Art As Social Practice. The Defence of the Concept of the Autonomous Field of Cultural Production

100%

Piotrowska M.

Art Inquiry. Recherches sur les arts

|

2019

|

vol. XXI

69-83

PL

Celem artykułu jest namysł nad poststrukturalistyczną konceptualizacją praktyk społecznych i autonomicznych pól produkcji kulturowej w późnej twórczości Pierre'a Bourdieu, zmierzający w kierunku wyodrębnienia specyfiki autonomicznego pola sztuki i uchwycenia nastawienia auto¬ra wobec własnych konstrukcji teoretycznych. Autonomiczne pole sztuki rysuje się w tym kontek¬ście jako jedna z takich trwających wciąż struktur o charakterze historycznym, które umożliwiają produkcję i reprodukcję kultury; jako stosunkowo wolne od zewnętrznych nacisków, autonomicz¬ne pola produkcji kulturowej sprzyjają akumulacji wiedzy i wzmacniają potencjał refleksji. Jako takie – pole sztuki jest diagnozowane u Bourdieu jako współczesna wartość wymagająca obrony. Autorka wydobywając z konceptualizacji Bourdieu tę diagnozę, z którą się zgadza, stara się tak¬że wskazać najważniejsze tradycje humanistyczne, które, według niej, umożliwiły nowoczesne i współczesne ujęcia teorii praktyki oraz rozwój myśli Bourdieu w kierunku emancypacyjnym.

EN

The article’s aim is to reflect on the late poststructuralist conceptualisations of social practices and autonomous fields of cultural production by Pierre Bourdieu in order to distin¬guish the specificity of the autonomous field of art and to grasp the author’s attitudes to these theoretical constructions. The autonomous field of art is being drawn in the late thought of the French thinker as one of the still existing structures of historical character enabling cultural production and reproduction that is relatively free from external pressures, favours the accu¬mulation of knowledge and enhances reflection. As such – it is diagnosed as a contemporary value in need of defence. The author of these considerations tries to extract this diagnosis, with which she agrees, form Bourdieu’s thought. She also attempts to point out the most important, according to her, humanistic traditions which enabled some selected approaches to the theory of practice of modernity and late modernity, and thus the development of Bourdieu’s ideas towards emancipation.

2

A. Giddensa teoria strukturacji a teoria konstruktywizmu strukturalnego P. Bourdieu

100%

Turowski J.

Roczniki Nauk Społecznych

|

2005

|

vol. 33

|

issue 1

37-59

EN

The author makes a comparative analysis of the views in sociology of the dilemmas between agency and the social structure that shapes it (in Giddens’s formulation) and on the dilemma between objectivism and subjectivism in approaching reality (in P. Bordieu’s formulation). Both these theoreticians agree in recognizing these dilemmas-antinomies as merely apparent and false ones. Both Giddens and Bourdieu declare abandoning controversy on the „nature” of the individual and society in the form of the dichotomy: agency-structure, or the dilemma: objectivism-subjectivism, and making the investigations of social practices, that is of real social behaviors and agency, the subject of sociological studies. For study reasons they define the individual–man in a neutral way as an „acting subject”, „social actor”, and the social collective–social group, term as a „collective actor” and „group subject”. Analysis of social practices that are ordered in time and space made by Giddens shows that individuals-subjects undertake and reproduce routine and strategic actions and they are guided by p r a c t i c a l c o n s c i o u s n e s s, comprising both knowledge and control of their agency. They monitor their behavior. They (subjects) are characterized by selfreflexiveness (Giddens) or habitus as a set of dispositions inclining social actors to respond and act in a definite way in a given situation (Bourdieu). Hence they are characterized by self r e g u l a t i o n. The agency happens in a certain connection with the structure. The structure comprises a set of institutionalized rules–ways and significant codes of behavior as well as resources, the so-called allocation and authority resources (Giddens) with the help of which the agency is done. Hence agency as actions and structure as „the means” of agency constitute a duality, that is divided only analytically. Duality is the main thesis of the structuration theory formulated by Giddens. Structure in Bourdieu’s formulation is characterized by objectivity; it is interiorized by individuals and is subjectivized by individuals in the course of upbringing and being exposed in the biographical course of life, but then it is also subjected to externalization in the shape of reproduction of agencies, construing new or modified agencies, new forms of organizations, behavior patterns or professed values and recognized norms. These processes or „mechanism”: of subjectivization of objectivity and objectivization of in a way processed subjectivity are defined as „theory of structural constructivism. With a little different understandings of „structure” and in a little different ways both authors solve – as it appears – apparent dilemmas. To define super-individual social wholes in which individuals occur in social life Giddens introduces the concepts of social system and of society conceding the attribute of subjectiveness to them. On the other hand, Bourdieu rejects this definition and leaves the study of the network of relations – various kinds of relations occurring between individuals, that is the so-called interhuman spaces, and of the symbolic fields it consists of, that are various and differentiated spheres of actions, interests-values which individuals enter with an adequate „capital” and compete with one another in the „symbolic struggle” for their interests-values. Authority and subjectivity of an individual. Authority is the domination occurring between people in social life. The sources of authority lie in the differences in resources (of allocations and authority) that individuals or societies-states have at their disposal (Giddens). Authority has a s y m b o l i c character, it is conferred with the help of proper rituals and if it is in some way respected, it derives its validity from that fact; otherwise it is a symbolic violence. The state is a self-validating monopolist of symbolic violence (Bourdieu). In the synthetic conclusion both authors express the view that all structural conditions preserve and respect t h e s u b j e c t i v i t y o f t h e i n d i v i d u a l’s agency, since limiting some they liberate other agencies and make them possible (Gidden), and the habitus gives a possibility of different behaviors in immediate social situations and of recognizing and considering objective historical structural conditions in the activity of social subjects (Bourdieu).

3

Pedagogika bezpieczeństwa – nowa subdyscyplina

88%

Dembiński M.

Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, sectio J – Paedagogia-Psychologia

|

2019

|

vol. 32

|

issue 3

EN

The aim of the article was not only just the justification for the appointment of security pedagogy as a new sub-discipline of pedagogy, but also to clarify it by referring to the idea of praxis described by the German thinker Dietrich Benner. For this purpose, I present his views on the pedagogical principles of praxis and I broaden them with proposals of principles of thinking and of acting, which should be part of the general structure of praxis, that is ethics, aesthetics, politics, economics and religion. I refer the whole through pedagogical praxis to its foundations, that is, to the theory of upbringing, theory of practice and theory of pedagogical institutions, in which I place the pedagogy of security. Finally, reflecting on the goals, tasks and place of education in the field of security pedagogy, and also I indicate dangers, that may become a source of its pathological identity.

PL

Celem opracowania było nie tylko uzasadnienie powołania pedagogiki bezpieczeństwa jako nowej subdyscypliny pedagogiki, lecz także jej dookreślenie przez odwołanie się do idei praxis opisanej przez niemieckiego myśliciela Dietricha Bennera. W tym celu nie tylko przybliżam jego poglądy na temat zasad pedagogicznej praxis i poszerzam je o propozycje zasad myślenia i działania, które powinny wpisywać się w ogólnoludzką strukturę praxis, czyli w etykę, estetykę, politykę, ekonomię i religię. Całość odnoszę przez pedagogiczną praxis do jej podstawy, czyli do teorii wychowania, teorii kształcenia i teorii instytucji pedagogicznych, w przestrzeni której sytuuję pedagogikę bezpieczeństwa. W końcu, zastanawiając się nad celami, zadaniami i miejscem edukacji w obszarze pedagogiki bezpieczeństwa, wskazuję niebezpieczeństwa, które mogą stać się źródłem jej patologicznej tożsamości.

4

Scenariusz filmowy jako inspiracja

63%

Hendrykowski M.

Images. The International Journal of European Film, Performing Arts and Audiovisual Communication

|

2014

|

vol. 14

|

issue 23

211-218

EN

Screenplay is a multifunctional project written by screenwriter or screenwriters for preparing next phases of film production. Changing and many times transformed forms of screenplay belong to the nature of screenwriting. Literary vision of film changes several times being result of synergy and typical work in progress: from general idea and high concept, through story, treatment, scalette, first draft and certain number of drafts, to final draft, director’s draft and shooting script. Marek Hendrykowski’s study describes and explains these terms as forms of literary film creation in three complementary aspects: creative re-vision, rewriting and remodeling.

PL

Screenplay is a multifunctional project written by screenwriter or screenwriters for preparing next phases of film production. Changing and many times transformed forms of screenplay belong to the nature of screenwriting. Literary vision of film changes several times being result of synergy and typical work in progress: from general idea and high concept, through story, treatment, scalette, first draft and certain number of drafts, to final draft, director’s draft and shooting script. Marek Hendrykowski’s study describes and explains these terms as forms of literary film creation in three complementary aspects: creative re-vision, rewriting and remodeling.

Refine search results

1 Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, sectio J – Paedagogia-Psychologia

1 Art Inquiry. Recherches sur les arts

1 Images. The International Journal of European Film, Performing Arts and Audiovisual Communication

1 Roczniki Nauk Społecznych

1 Dembiński M.

1 Hendrykowski M.

1 Piotrowska M.

1 Turowski J.

2 2019

1 2014

1 2005

Pierre Bourdieu on Art As Social Practice. The Defence of the Concept of the Autonomous Field of Cultural Production

A. Giddensa teoria strukturacji a teoria konstruktywizmu strukturalnego P. Bourdieu

Pedagogika bezpieczeństwa – nowa subdyscyplina

Scenariusz filmowy jako inspiracja