Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Journals help

  1. 1 Studia Prawnicze

Authors help

  1. 1 Syryt A.

Years help

  1. 1 2014

Results found: 1

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  uzasadnienie orzeczenia Trybunału Konstytucyjnego
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

Zasada jawności a uzasadnienie orzeczenia Trybunału Konstytucyjnego

100%
Syryt A.
Studia Prawnicze
|
2014
|
issue 4 (200)
87-97
EN
The Constitutional Tribunal is called a “court of law”. The proceedings before that body of law must meet the requirements of a fair procedure. Guarantee of a fair trial is its openness and transparency. Openness and transparency is implemented for example by public hearing or through the publication of decisions of this body in the appropriate set of official. The principle of openness is implemented by justify rulings of Constitutional Tribunal which contain specific reasons of taking the decision. Justification of a ruling protects against arbitrary action of the Constitutional Tribunal. A justification of a ruling is an admissible voice of Constitutional Tribunal in the public debate. Openness and transparency implemented by justification of decisions of the Constitutional Tribunal allows to build the authority of that body in the country. Matters which are in the judgments can be informative and educational. Way of describing the issues in the justifications of rulings can also trendsetting understanding of certain bodies of constitutional law in a democratic state ruled by law.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.