Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  varieties
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The study compared yield of six cultivars of winter triticale on two levels agronomic a1 and a2. At the level of a1 applied the basic mineral fertilization taking into account forecrop and soil type. At the level of a2 increased mineral nitrogen fertilization of 40 kg ∙ ha-1 using foliar fertilizers and protection of incubation. In both cases, if desired, to chemical insecticides and fungicides. The collection was carried out in full maturity stage scale BBCH 89. The highest yield of winter triticale obtained in 2014. The average yield of winter triticale at the level of agricultural technology a1 in 2014 amounted to 92.4 dt ∙ ha-1 and was higher compared to the yield in 2012 and 2013, respectively, 17% and 25%. By applying the agro-technical a2 average yield of winter triticale in 2014 amounted to 108.4 dt ∙ ha-1 and was higher compared to the year 2012 and 2013 respectively A19% and 22%. The lowest yield of winter triticale in three growing seasons at the level of agricultural technology a1 obtained from a variety of Cerberus, and its yield in 2013 amounted to 60.8 dt ∙ ha-1. The highest yield of winter triticale at the level of agricultural technology a1 obtained from a variety Agostino, whose yield in 2014 was 101.2 dt ∙ ha-1. At the level of agricultural technology a1 yielded the lowest in over three years of research cultivar of winter triticale Zirconium and its yield in 2013 amounted to 75.1 dt ∙ ha-1. In 2014, the same variety of winter triticale obtained the highest yield during the whole period of research. Its yield at the level of agricultural technology a2 in 2014 amounted to 112.2 dt ∙ ha-1. The yield of winter triticale varieties Zirconium in 2014 with the same agricultural techniques was higher by 37.1 dt ∙ ha-1 which is 33.1% compared to 2013.
PL
W pracy porównano plonowanie sześciu odmian pszenżyta ozimego na dwóch poziomach agrotechnicznych a1 i a2. Na poziomie a1 stosowano podstawowe nawożenie mineralne uwzględniające przedplon i rodzaj gleby. Na poziomie a2 zwiększano nawożenie azotowe mineralne o 40 kg∙ha-1 z zastosowaniem nalistnych nawozów wieloskładnikowych i ochroną przed wyleganiem. W obu przypadkach w razie potrzeby stosowano środki chemiczne na insektycydy i fungicydy. Zbiór wykonano w fazie dojrzałości pełnej według skali BBCH 89. Najwyższy plon pszenżyta ozimego uzyskano w roku 2014. Średni plon pszenżyta ozimego na poziomie agrotechnicznym a1 w roku 2014 wyniósł 92,4 dt∙ha-1 i był większy w stosunku do plonu w roku 2012 i 2013 odpowiednio o 17% i 25%. Przy zastosowaniu poziomu agrotechnicznego a2 średni plon pszenżyta ozimego w 2014 roku wynosił 108,4 dt∙ha-1 i był większy w stosunku do roku 2012 i 2013 odpowiednio o 19% i 22%. Najniższy plon pszenżyta ozimego w trzech okresach wegetacyjnych na poziomie agrotechnicznym a1 uzyskano z odmiany Cerber, a jej plon w 2013 roku wyniósł 60,8 dt∙ha-1. Najwyższy plon pszenżyta ozimego na poziomie agrotechnicznym a1 uzyskano z odmiany Agostino, której plon w 2014 roku wyniósł 101,2 dt∙ha-1. Na poziomie agrotechnicznym a2 najniżej plonowała w ciągu trzech lata badań odmiana pszenżyta ozimego Cyrkon, a jej plon w 2013 roku wyniósł 75,1 dt∙ha-1. W 2014 roku z tej samej odmiany pszenżyta ozimego uzyskano najwyższy plon w ciągu całego okresu prowadzenia badań. Jej plon na poziomie agrotechnicznym a2 w 2014 roku wyniósł 112,2 dt∙ha-1. Plon pszenżyta ozimego odmiany Cyrkon w 2014 roku przy takiej samej agrotechnice był wyższy o 37,1 dt∙ha-1 co stanowi33,1% w stosunku do 2013 roku.
EN
The combination of linguistics and cultural analysis leads back to Wilhelm von Humboldt’s concept of linguistic worldview. In it, a direct connection between thinking and speaking (in a particular ethnic or national language) is presupposed, thus implying the influence of languages on cultures. In contrast to this postulate of the unity of languages and cultures, discourse-sensitive linguistics shows the diversity of varieties within ethno- or national-language-demarcated cultures. Linguistics in cultural studies thus escapes the danger of hypostasis of languages and cultures and methodologically becomes an integrative linguistics in which systemic, pragma- and sociolinguistic methods can be incorporated. Discourse-sensitive cultural linguistics analyzes cultures according to thematic and, above all, institutional discourses (of politics, religion, law, economics, science, etc.) and examines language use down to the level of individual utterances and their linguistic microstructures within the framework of these discursive macro levels. Another type is perlocutionary discourses which almost exclusively aim at the effect of communicative actions: advertising, propaganda, scandalous discourses etc. Discourse types are shown by Russian examples, especially the Russian national hymn, the provocative performances of the group Pussy Riot as an example of scandalous discourses, and state patriotic education as an example of propaganda discourses.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.