Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  własność lokali
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

Sprzedaż komórki lokatorskiej. Polemika z artykułem Michała Kućki pt. „Jeszcze o rozporządzeniu oraz o »rozporządzeniu« pomieszczeniem przynależnym do lokalu” („Rejent” 2021, nr 3, s. 11-27)

100%
Berek M.
Rejent
|
2021
|
issue 10 (366)
22-30
EN
The article contains a polemic with the view assuming that transfer of ownership of the storage room cannot take place in the contract of sale. The author tries to present arguments supporting opposite view, that concluding this type of contracts does not lead to violation of the law, regardless of the fact that the storage room cannot be a separate object of ownership within the meaning of art. 45 of the Polish Civil Code.
2

Dopuszczalność zastrzeżenia w umowie zawartej w trybie ustawy z 11.09.2019 r. - Prawo zamówień publicznych kary umownej, o której mowa w art. 436 pkt 4a pr. zam. publ.

100%
Szejna S.
Rejent
|
2021
|
issue 11 (367)
36-48
EN
The subject of this publication is to determine whether it is permissible and effective to reserve the analyzed clause in a contract concluded under the Public Procurement Law, due to the content of Art. 483 § 1 of the Civil Code - allowing for a contractual penalty only in the event of non-performance or improper performance of a non-pecuniary obligation. The analyzed clause raises the same doubts as to its effectiveness as the contractual penalty for failure to pay or delayed payment of remuneration due to the subcontractor or further subcontractors, referred to in Article 143d (1) (7a) of the Act of January 29, 2004. - Public procurement law (equivalent to Article 437 paragraph 1 item 7a of the Public Procurement Law). In order to answer the above question, it is necessary to establish the legal nature of the analyzed clause and whether the provision of Art. 436 point 4a of the Public Procurement Law is a lex specialis in relation to Article 483 §1 of the Civil Code. A similar problem has already been resolved by the Supreme Court (i.e. it concerned the admissibility of stipulating a contractual penalty in a construction contract concluded under the old Public Procurement Law for non-payment or untimely payment of remuneration due to a subcontractor or further subcontractor, as referred to in Article 143d (1)) point 7a of the old Public Procurement Law). However, this resolution did not resolve the problems related to the relation of Art. 143d section 1 point 7a of the old Public Procurement Law to the provisions of the Civil Code on contractual penalty, and on the contrary - introduced even greater difficulties in interpreting this regulation of the old Public Procurement Law. Thus, it is advisable to take up the issues being the subject of this publication.
3

Jeszcze o rozporządzaniu albo o „rozporządzaniu” pomieszczeniem przynależnym do lokalu

84%
Kućka M.
Rejent
|
2021
|
issue 3 (359)
11-27
EN
The paper covers admissibility and effects of contracts concerning “transfer” of so called adjoining rooms between owners of premises. These kind of rooms are legally considered by Polish legislator as “component parts” of appartments (when the appartments are objects of separate ownership) and therefore may not be transferred (a component part of a thing cannot be a separate object of ownership and other property rights). It is argued that these contracts lead to a change of content of ownership between owners of premises. It is possible because owners have right to modify or affect the object of their ownership (and by doinig this they modify the content of their ownership). These kind of contracts should be concluded in notarial deed and are effective only when the “acquirer” of an adjoining room is entered into land and mortgage register. It is also disputed that a “transfer” of an adjoining room leads to division of the appartment of which the room is a component. Otherwise it would lead to undesirable effects, for instance to creation of a collective mortgage (if the previous appartment from which the room was “separated”, was encumberred with a mortgage).
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Uwagi o zakresie zdolności prawnej wspólnoty mieszkaniowej (na tle wyroku Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 26 czerwca 2015 r. I CSK 312/14)

84%
Doliwa A.
Studia Prawnicze: rozprawy i materiały
|
2016
|
issue 1(18)
51-62
EN
This article examines the extent of the legal capacity of a homeowner association, in the light of the most recent judicial decisions. It presents a critical analysis of the view of the unlimited legal capacity of a homeowner association which is said to have exceeded the legal relationship resulting from the management of the real property common to the owners of individual premises.
PL
Artykuł dotyczy zagadnienia zakresu zdolności prawnej wspólnoty mieszkaniowej – na tle najnowszego orzecznictwa sądowego. W opracowaniu przedstawiono uwagi krytyczne na temat poglądu o nieograniczonym zakresie podmiotowości prawnej wspólnoty mieszkaniowej, która miałaby wykraczać poza stosunki prawne wynikające z zarządzania nieruchomością wspólną właścicieli lokali.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.