Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  wydatki na kulturę
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
There is no doubt that the monuments are an important element of regional physical infrastructure, which are no longer seen as cost prohibitive souvenir previous eras, but may be an important factor in economic development. If monuments could play an important role in local development, their conservation and status must be steadily improving. And in this area there are necessary to incur expenditure on the renewal and protection within the framework of activities related to culture. The National Strategy for the Development of Culture indicates a very low expenditure on culture (Chapter 921) in Poland, which in comparison to other EU countries were about 9 times lower than in Denmark, 7.5 times lower than in France, four times smaller than Germany. This situation is even less favorable looking at the level of local government, including municipalities. Expenditure municipalities for the maintenance and protection of monuments should contribute to improve the preservation of cultural heritage. Therefore, the aim of this article is the analysis of public expenditure on renewal of monuments, made at the municipal level in Poland between 2001 and 2011 Particular attention was paid to the period of economic slowdown in the country, ie. after 2009, to confirm the hypothesis that economic growth affects the amount of expenditure on renewal of monuments in Poland at the municipal level. The article is divided into three parts. The first concerns the theoretical issues related to the impact of economic growth on the level and structure of public expenditure for purposes connected with the renewal of the national heritage and, consequently affecting the condition of the monuments themselves. The second part is an analysis of the level and structure of expenditure of municipalities in Poland for these purposes, with reference to the economic growth and the number of monuments. In the third part, a comparison between the situation in the study area in different regions of Poland in 2004 and 2011. Translated by Katarzyna Kubiszewska
EN
Indicators are one of the most important elements in the appropriate structure of performance budgeting, because they allow to assess the degree of goal achievement through the tasks and activities performed. The aim of this study is to show differences in the quantification of culture expenditure in the budget of Poland and France. As a result, the research hypothesis is as follows: Due to the similar nature in the conduct of cultural policy, the same methods of quantifying tasks and programs should exist in the budget of Poland and France. We use as a research method the comparative descriptive analysis. The analysis of exemplary expenditures within the selected task and program is to show whether consistency in determining the measures has been preserved and necessary changes have been introduced to properly assess the objectives achievement. Due to different dates of the performance budget introduction in both countries, the analysis is for the years 2009–2016 in the case of Poland and for the years 2006–2016 in the case of France.
PL
We właściwej konstrukcji budżetu zadaniowego mierniki stanowią jeden z najistotniejszych elementów, który warunkuje prawidłową ocenę stopnia osiągnięcia celu poprzez wykonane zadania i działania. Celem niniejszych badań jest pokazanie różnic w kwantyfikacji wydatków na kulturę w budżecie Polski i Francji. W efekcie hipoteza badawcza jest następująca: Ze względu na zbliżony charakter w prowadzeniu polityki kulturalnej w budżecie Polski i Francji powinny występować te same metody kwantyfikacji zadań i programów. W opracowaniu zastosowano metodę porównawczej analizy opisowej. Przeprowadzona analiza przykładowych wydatków w obrębie wybranego zadania i programu ma wykazać, czy zachowano konsekwencję w określeniu mierników, czy dokonano zmian koniecznych do właściwej oceny stopnia realizacji celów. Ze względu na różne daty wprowadzania budżetu zadaniowego w porównywanych krajach, przyjęty dla Polski okres badawczy przypada na lata 2009–2016, natomiast w przypadku Francji dotyczy lat 2006–2016.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.