Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  wzory zachowań
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The issue of lifestyles in social sciences has an ample history. The beginning of the success won by the idea of a ‘lifestyle’ in sociology should be associated with Max Weber, Therstein Veblen and Georg Simmel. In modern times, especially from the perspective of empirical sociology, it is accepted that ‘lifestyle’ is connected with more or less cohesive patterns of behavior and individual values. A review done by the Institute of Opinion Study GfK Polonia in July 2002 on a group of randomly chosen 1000 people aged 15 and more revealed five basic group of Poles practicing various lifestyles. Generally 11% of Poles may be called ‘conquerors’, 35% - ‘pioneers’, and 27% - ‘traditionalists’. A further 7% is characterized by an ‘elite’ lifestyle, whereas 20% makes up a group of ‘misfits’. Individualism and being oriented towards values of self-realization, of being open to the surrounding reality and the ability to ‘manage’ is first of all characteristic of ‘conquerors’. The ‘elite’ and ‘pioneers’ distinctly try to make a synthesis of traditional life principles, expressed e.g. by the values of acceptance and duty, and the ‘new’, individualist-self-realization ones. In turn, ‘traditionalists’ completely deliberately remain with traditional life values and principles that have been tested by the previous generations. However, this is not an ‘escapist’ lifestyle, but a conscious rejection of the life principles based on individualism. It is this attitude that makes ‘traditionalists’ different from ‘misfits’ whose ‘clinging’ to tradition first of all results from the fear of an individualized society, and not from a conscious choice.
EN
The author presents the socio-cultural perspective of learning aggression and violence with a main reference to sports culture. The problems of aggression and destructiveness are analyzed in the light of the concepts of Aronson, Fromm and other theorists. The historical perspective of sport brutalization and institutional acceptance was also shown. A discussion was initiated regarding the accuracy of the aggression phenomenon. From the theory of human destructiveness of Erich Fromm, the author proceeds to its application – a proposal to counteract aggressiveness using the means of physical culture. Well, the “Humanistic Theory of Martial Arts”, complementary to the concept of Fromm, and the same skillfully taught martial arts in their traditional form are ways to counteract aggressiveness and a good way to prevent violence.
PL
Autor przedstawia perspektywę społeczno-kulturową uczenia się agresji i przemocy z głównym odniesieniem do kultury sportowej. Problemy agresji i destrukcyjności analizowane są w świetle koncepcji Aronsona, Fromma i innych teoretyków. Ukazano też historyczną perspektywę brutalizacji sportu i instytucjonalnej tego akceptacji. Podjęto dyskusję dotyczącą trafności eksplikacji zjawiska agresji. Od teorii ludzkiej destrukcyjności Ericha Fromma autor przechodzi do jej aplikacji – propozycji przeciwdziałania agresywności z wykorzystaniem środków kultury fizycznej. Otóż „Humanistyczna Teoria Sztuk Walki”, komplementarna wobec koncepcji Fromma, i same umiejętnie nauczane sztuki walki w ich tradycyjnej postaci są drogami przeciwdziałania agresywności i dobrym sposobem profilaktyki przemocy.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.