Search results

1

Walory artystyczne i kulturowe zabytków przy ich wycenie

100%

Pawlikowska-Piechotka A.

Ochrona Zabytków

|

2000

|

issue 3

294-298

EN

In the case of outstanding historical monuments, invaluable documents of national history (Wawel Castle, Malbork Castle of the Teutonic Order, the Royal Castle in Warsaw, the palace in Wilanow), a question concerning their value will always give rise to doubts and will remain without a satisfactory response. On the other hand, in the instance of the majority of monuments, which are part of the market turnover, a decision concerning the purchase of real estate necessitates even if only an estimate of the market value of the monument, and a calculation of the indispensable input rendering possible the renewed utilisation of the object. A detailed determination of the value of historical real estate calls for thorough opinions, offered by a property expert. The procedure of the estimate is delineated by detailed guide lines of the Professional Standards of Property Experts. A correctly constructed all-sided opinion concerning the value of the property should be constructed in the manner of a multi-segment report. The major part of historical real estate is appraised by using traditional principles (a comparative and profit approach). Experts accentuate the fact that upon each occasion the key issue is to answer the question whether the estimate pertains only to the object as a construction or also to its artistic and historical-cultural stratum. In such conditions, a conscientious expert opinion calls for extremely high qualifications and a close familiarity with the market (not only the evaluation of the objects as such, but also the skill of foreseeing the reaction and the psyche of the potential buyer).

2

Dziedzictwo kulturowe województwa wielkopolskiego w świetle danych Narodowego Instytutu Dziedzictwa. Przykład zabytków nieruchomych

100%

Siniecka A., Bogacka E.

Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna

|

2018

|

issue 44

53-65

PL

Otaczające nas dziedzictwo kulturowe stanowi cenny zasób będący świadectwem naszej historii, którego zachowanie dla przyszłych pokoleń jest niezwykle istotne. Artykuł przedstawia dziedzictwo kulturowe w województwie wielkopolskim, regionie o szczególnym znaczeniu dla powstania i rozwoju całego państwa. Analizie zostały poddane zabytki nieruchome znajdujące się w rejestrze zabytków Narodowego Instytutu Dziedzictwa.

3

Zabytki nieruchome jako materialny kapitał kulturowy wielkopolskich miast

75%

Stachowiak K., Siniecka A.

Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna

|

2021

|

issue 57

91-107

EN

The aim of the article is to identify the main features and specificity of the material cultural capital of Wielkopolska region towns, the core of which is the stock of immovable monuments. In the first part, the concept of cultural capital is briefly presented and the specificity of monuments as capital is explained, focusing on the values that are assigned to monuments. This provided a theoretical basis for the characterisation of the stock of immovable monuments in Wielkopolska region towns, which constitute their material cultural capital. It has been characterized in terms of the main cultural values (historical and semiotic) and use value. The analysis was carried out according to the size categories of towns (small, medium and large), which made it possible to discover the specificity of cultural capital in these cities. The results of the conducted research indicate a significant cultural capital of small towns, the potential of which is associated with sacred buildings, urban layouts, as well as manors and palaces.

PL

Celem artykułu jest identyfikacja głównych cech i specyfiki materialnego kapitału kulturowego miast wielkopolskich, którego trzon stanowi zasób zabytków nieruchomych. W pierwszej części przedstawiono krótko koncepcję kapitału kulturowego i wyjaśniono specyfikę zabytków jako kapitału, koncentrując się na wartościach przydawanych zabytkom. Dało to podstawy teoretyczne do charakterystyki zasobu zabytków nieruchomych miast wielkopolskich, które stanowią ich materialny kapitał kulturowy. Został on scharakteryzowany w ujęciu głównych wartości kulturowych (historycznej i semiotycznej) oraz wartości użytkowej. Analizy dokonano według kategorii wielkościowych miast (małe, średnie i duże), co pozwoliło odkryć specyfikę kapitału kulturowego w tych miastach. Rezultaty badań wskazują na znaczny kapitał kulturowy małych miast, którego potencjał wiąże się z obiektami sakralnymi, układami urbanistycznymi, a także dworami i pałacami.

4

Problemy użytkowania zabytków architektury

75%

Strukowa H.

Ochrona Zabytków

|

1976

|

issue 2

116-121

EN

Considerable progress in the field of historical monuments protection was made after the Second World War; For various reasons, however, it could not protect many historical buildings from ruin and destruction. In compliance with the instructions given by Prime Minister and Ministry of Culture and Arts, departments where a number of institutions took charge of various historical buildings (especially the department of agriculture) remarkably increased their expenditures on repairs of historical monuments being in administration of their field branches. General Conservator of Monuments initiated a new form of protection of Polish cultural property: he suggested that historical buildings might be taken over by various institutions and adapted to their needs. As a result of this suggestion 140 historical buildings have been taken over so far. The next form of popularization of patronage by various institutions over the monuments was a competition for the best tenant of historical buildings organized in 1975. The jury awarded prizes and diplomas to 16 institutions patronizing historical buildings. First prize was awarded to the State Centre of Domestic Animals Insemination in Karczów, Voivodship of Opole, for repairs and adaptation as well as for the best keeping of the palace and garden complex from the turn of the 17th century, the Centre overhauled the palace at its own charge. Second prize was won by Gułtowy State Farm, Voivodship of Poznań, for repairs, preservation, interior decorations, adptaticn and outfit of the palace from the end of the 18th century at its own charge. Third prize was awarded ex aequo to the Institute of Zootechnics in Cracow (the Zator Section in Zator, Voivodship of Bielsko Biała) and to the Preventive and Sanatorium Treatment Centre in Moszna, Voivodship of Opole, for saving and adaptation of historical buildings according to conservation rules. Moreover, the jury awarded the social protector cf historical monuments who in 1975 took care of the ruined Tower in Chojna and overhauled it at his own charge. The above-mentioned forms of historical monuments protection will be carried on and popularized by the Board of Museums and Protection of Historical Monuments.

5

Rejestr i ewidencja zabytków nieruchomych oraz ruchomych w działaniach Narodowego Instytutu Dziedzictwa

45%

Szałygin J.

Ochrona Zabytków

|

2012

|

issue 1-2

117-158

EN

The National Heritage Board of Poland continues directly the activity of the first institution dealing with the collection, elaboration and popularisation of knowledge on historical monuments in Poland – the Centre for Documentation of Monuments, which was established in 1962. The organisational structure of the institution evolved, but among its priority tasks there were still documentation-related works: collection, elaboration and making available of the record of monuments in the form of record documentation and legal documentation of all registered monuments. The department which has carried out these tasks in a virtually unaltered manner is the current Monument Record and Register Department. The current tasks of the Department include also the elaboration of documentation standards, preparation of the record, keeping of the register of monuments and training of conservation services in this respect. Currently we are also supervising the performance of the monument register verification project – the description of the resource of monuments in Poland. These activities make it possible to provide successive generations with knowledge on the material culture of our ancestors, on authentic, transformed or defunct objects, complexes of objects and the cultural landscape. Our documentations are used in scientific studies and research works and constitute a basis for conservation projects. They are used for restoring the destroyed and defunct objects that constitute a significant element of national heritage. The Monument Record and Register Department collects, elaborates and provides access to knowledge on monuments in Poland in a continuous manner (under various names). MRRD collects duplicates of the documentation of monuments forming a part of the collection of the national record of monuments, which is elaborated for the needs of voivodeship conservators and by voivodeship conservators of monuments, that are sent to NHBP. The record as a form of documentation dates back to the middle of the 18th century and its legal grounds were established in 1928. The following record documentations are kept in the Monument Record and Register Department (amount as at 31.12.2011): • record cards of monuments of architecture and historic buildings (138,304 items, including 104,420 white cards and 33,884 green cards), • address cards of monuments (650,000), • records of historic greens (9,249), • record cards of cemeteries (25,367), • town planning files (1,274), • cards of movable monuments (371,876), • record cards of movable monuments of technology (9,710). Other forms of record documentation being used currently are the communal record of monuments and record lists of monuments. The regular updating of the list of shortages is one of the elements of the keeping of the central record of monuments in the activity of MRRD. Many activities concerning the documentation of monuments are performed in accordance with the well-established tradition. The challenging process that is necessary to carry out is the digitalisation of collections of the record. The central register of monuments has been kept as a primary form of monument protection since 1962. The Department maintains a uniform database system, which is understood as a specially developed kind of software (Multiarch). The database of objects entered into the register of monuments that is kept in NHBP is the only database in Poland that encompasses all legally protected non-movable and movable monuments. The verification of the register of nonmovable movements is an important task co-ordinated by the Monument Record and Register Department, which has been carried out by Local Divisions of NHBP since the end of 2008. Long-term plans of verification of the register of monuments apply to movable monuments, too. In practice, the performance of the main aforementioned tasks is often connected with additional activities, part of which is a consequence of the employees’ own initiative, knowledge and commitment as well as identification with the 50-year tradition and achievements of NHBP’s predecessors.

Refine search results

3 Ochrona Zabytków

2 Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna

2 Siniecka A.

1 Bogacka E.

1 Pawlikowska-Piechotka A.

1 Stachowiak K.

1 Strukowa H.

1 Szałygin J.

1 2021

1 2018

1 2012

1 2000

1 1976

Walory artystyczne i kulturowe zabytków przy ich wycenie

Dziedzictwo kulturowe województwa wielkopolskiego w świetle danych Narodowego Instytutu Dziedzictwa. Przykład zabytków nieruchomych

Zabytki nieruchome jako materialny kapitał kulturowy wielkopolskich miast

Problemy użytkowania zabytków architektury

Rejestr i ewidencja zabytków nieruchomych oraz ruchomych w działaniach Narodowego Instytutu Dziedzictwa