Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  zaimki wskazujące
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
Gwary Dziś
|
2015
|
vol. 7
177-189
EN
The paper deals with some contact phenomena in grammar typical of the ascendant dialects, which were inherited by two Czech and one Polish immigrant patois spoken in Russia. The Czech patois are located in several villages near Novorossiysk and Anapa in the Northern Caucasus and also in the Middle Irtysh area of the Omsk Region, the Polish (Masovian) one in the Krasnoyarsk Region and in the Republic of Khakassia.These patois show relatively good preservation of their original dialectal systems, including not only old lexical borrowings from German, but also grammatical features that appeared as a result of the longtime contact of West Slavic dialects with German in central and northeastern Europe. At the same time the systems of the examined patois as a whole, as well as their elements of contact origin, have been strongly influenced by their East Slavic language surroundings, most of all by the Russian language. The author concludes that set and functioning of the analyzed borrowed units or structures and contact features in Czech and Polish dialects although partly similar, differed somewhat. It depended on the speakers’ relative tendencies to personalize and give detail; it also depended on the features sentence construction observed in both languages.
EN
From the logical point of view, the most interesting among the pronouns are demonstrative pronouns (especially: this/that), indefinite pronouns (a/an), definite pronoun (the) and quantifying pronouns (every, all, some). Unlike personal pronouns (e.g. I/you/he) they are in fact functors (of the n/n category). The differentiation between personal pronouns (n) and functor pronouns (n/n) is vital here. This differentiation does not exist in traditional grammar. The study is limited to determining functor pronouns with the use of logical properties of quantifying expressions, which are functor pronouns themselves – all (n) and some (cr) – formally expressed in the quantifier-less calculus of names (BRN). The calculus is properly enriched with demonstrative pronouns (demonstrativa), in connection to certain studies by Toshiharu Waragai (LID). An attempt to employ this system (BRND) in the analysis of some fragments of Ockham’s Summa Logicae is shown here. The work is concluded with the analysis of a functor pronoun the only (t), being a special case of a definite pronoun, which is characterised here by means of rules. The work reveals the connection between this pronoun and the operator of definite descriptions (marked in the same way) in relation to a certain Ludwik Borkowski’s conception.
IT
L’ana-catafora è la più « giovane » tra le relazioni diaforiche, dopo l’anafora e la catafora, che combina le caratteristiche formali e funzionali delle sue maggiori sorelle endoforiche. Con il presente contributo si propone di identificare e descrivere la relazione diaforica in questione, ricorrendo a vari parametri tassonomici (tra i quali la direzione del vettore, la forma dell’espressione diaforica, la forma del cotesto o il campo, la portata, il modo di donazione del referente e la coreferenzialità o meno tra diaforizzante e diaforizzato); ciò allo scopo di misurare il potenziale dei pronomi dimostrativi italiani questo e quello, variabili e invariabili, e di determinare il dimostrativo più produttivo nella mediazione delle relazioni ana-cataforiche. Le osservazioni di natura tipologica e le conseguenti conclusioni sono basate sul lavoro analitico condotto sul materiale linguistico estratto dal subcorpus Generale 1 dei corpora NUNC, testimoni di tendenze evolutive osservabili nell’italiano scritto / parlato, adoperato da utenti di diversi gruppi di discussione presenti in Rete.
EN
The ana-cataphora is the “youngest” among diaphoric relations, after anaphora and cataphora, and combines characteristics of its “older” endophoric relatives.The present paper identifies and describes this diaphoric relation by using various taxonomic parameters (vector, diaphoric expression, cotext or field, scope, referent identification manner, coreferentiality) in order to measure the potential of the demonstratives in question and to determine the most productive demonstrative form as an ana-cataphoric catalyst. Observations, remarks and conclusions are based on the analysis of research data extracted from the subcorpus Generale 1 of NUNC corpora, reflecting evolutionary tendencies observable in spoken/written Italian, used in discussion groups of the global network.
PL
Artykuł dotyczy „najmłodszej” spośród relacji diaforycznych, po anaforze i kataforze, łączącej w sobie cechy dwóch pozostałych — ana-katafory. Celem pracy jest identyfikacja i opis tego typu relacji za pomocą różnorodnych kategorii taksonomicznych, zmierzenie potencjału analizowanych zaimków i wyłonienie formy najbardziej produktywnej w realizacji relacji ana-kataforycznych oraz ich ilościowe porównanie z częstotliwością występowania pozostałych relacji diaforycznych. Obserwacje i wnioski są oparte o pracę analityczną przeprowadzoną na korpusie NUNC Generale 1, będącym zapisem komunikacji użytkowników grup dyskusyjnych w sieci.
EN
The paper discusses the syntactic status of the Polish demonstrative pronoun ten ‘this’ in the light of grammaticalization theory. The discussion begins with establishing formal (morphosyntactic) as well as semantic criteria for discriminating between articles and demonstratives. Then it reviews arguments for the demonstrative status of ten put forward in the literature. The paper ends with providing evidence for the definite article status of ten. Although the primary function of ten is still that of a demonstrative pronoun, it reveals some traces of categorial change on the grammaticalization cline in spoken Polish.
PL
Niniejszy artykuł omawia składniowy status polskiego zaimka wskazującego ten w ramach teorii gramatykalizacji. W pierwszej części artykułu zostały ustalone kryteria formalne (morfoskładniowe) i semantyczne pomocne w odróżnianiu zaimków wskazujących od przedimków. Następnie przedstawione zostały argumenty potwierdzające status zaimka wskazującego omawianego elementu. Ostatnia część artykułu jest poświęcona przedimkowym właściwościom zaimka ten. Pomimo że podstawową funkcją tej części mowy jest funkcja zaimka wskazującego, artykuł pokazuje, że ten zdradza również cechy przedimkowe szczególnie w potocznym języku polskim.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.