In economic literature concerning crisis, a renaissance of Keynesianism can be ob-served. The purpose of the article was to verify the hypothesis of Keynesianism’s revival by analyzing the chosen works of subject’s literature. This purpose was achieved through presentation of key elements of Keynes’s legacy, the assessment of its signifi-cance measured in contribution to the development of economics as science, and also the utility of Keynesian theory, understood as the possibility of its adaptation for stabilizing the economy in the current crisis time. The analysis carried out in this article leads to a conclusion that although references to Keynes’s recommendations are visible in the stabilization policy, it has not caused long-lasting changes in the structure of economics as a science. istniejące bezrobocie, oraz twierdzenie, że biedni cechują się większą krańcową skłonnością do konsumpcji niż bogaci, co oznaczało, że redystrybucja dochodu mogłaby zwiększyć produkcję i zatrudnienie.
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.