Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 5

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
UK
Питання на нашій панелі, нагадую, поставлено наступним чином: «Хто з ким і проти кого у ґлобальному світі ХХІ століття?» Ідеться про своєрідний геополітичний пасьянс сьогодення. Тема майже неосяжна, а реґламент доповіді вкрай обмежений. Тому висловлюся в режимі тез, без належного розгортання і арґументації основних тверджень. Щоб, за потреби, у процесі подальшої дискусії, якої поза сумнівом заслуговує тема, розгорнути ті чи ті положення доповіді.
UK
Інституційні та змістові засади зрушень у пострадянській гуманітаристиці: віхи та події Якими, на Вашу думку, є найзначущіші для ста новлення філософії в Україні події кінця 1980-х — початку 1990-х років?
EN
The legacy of the 20th century — the results of the newest aggressive paganism, combined paradoxically with acquisitions of emancipated intellect which is not constrained with morals — worries to death even in the 19th century. This, in particular, is witnessed by the newest Russian imperialism which has absorbed the mythology of the “coming boor”, traditions of nihilism and anomy, political culture of the Moscow khanate, fed by propagandistic machine of the Kremlin. That is why the leading scientific subjects of the book The Red Century by Myroslav Popovich have gained the acute urgency; the book is a certain encyclopedia of phobias, drawbacks, divergences and latent threats proceeding from that social, political and cultural commonness of the 20th century which resulted in the greatest victims in the history of mankind. The round-table meeting dedicated to this book had the aim to plunge the most urgent narratives of The Red Century in the present notional context. Such a task foresaw the use of interdisciplinary methodological optics with participation of well-known philosophers, philologists, historians with the aim to find the ways of healing from the phobias, drawbacks, and divergences of the century which has passed. The round-table meeting participants discussed the broad range of questions: historical and cultural preconditions of geopolitical events of the 20th century (M. Popovich); lessons that we have to learn proceeding from these events (V. Skurativskyi); content of the present geopolitical situation (S. Proleev); contradictions of modernization and destruction of the moral and political universalism in the context of totalitarianism (A. Yer mo len ko); doubtful role of ressentiment as the motive force of history (V. Kozlovskyi); problems of identity in formation of the nation-state (O.Bilyi); prospects of the national state system in the 21st century (O. Maiboroda); Ukrainian context of the Second World war (Yu. Sha poval); a phenomenon of stateless subjectness of the Ukrainian nation in the historical context (S. Hrabovskyi).
EN
The round-table sitting dedicated to the Russian-Ukrainian war took place on October 24, 2014. The question was, in particular, of its cultural and historical factors and peculiarities of the conflict of consciousnesses in the course of Ukraine-Russia opposition. The participants have analyzed the phenomenon of the hybrid war as anomia, outlined a rational system of ensuring national security. There have been represented the original interpretation of the war discourse and euphemisation of political leaders’ language as the reduction of truth. The myth of the “Russian world” was considered as the basis of mobilization strategies of the aggressor and cognitive structure of its strategic culture. The correlation between philosophic traditions and the method of fighting the war have been outlined.
EN
Problems of coexistence, interaction and preservation of national cultures become more and more significant during the globalization epoch. Whether the local is forced out by the global? Whether there arises a uniform world culture? What forms do processes of a spiritual exchange take today? These and accompanying questions were a subject matter of consideration of joint conference of the Russian and Ukrainian philosophers which have taken place in Kiev.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.