Book Review: B. Adamczewski, The Gospel of Luke. A Hypertextual Commentary (European Studies in Theology, Philosophy and History of Religions 13), (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Edition 2016).
PL
Book Review: Bartosz Adamczewski, The Gospel of Luke. A Hypertextual Commentary (European Studies in Theology, Philosophy and History of Religions 13) (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Edition 2016).
Recenzja książki: Candida R. Moss and Joel S. Baden, Reconceiving Infertility: Biblical Perspectives on Procreation and Childlessness (Princeton University Press, 2015.
EN
Book review: Candida R. Moss and Joel S. Baden, Reconceiving Infertility: Biblical Perspectives on Procreation and Childlessness (Princeton University Press, 2015.
Lukan Mariology does not present a holistic picture of Jesus’ Mother, although no doubt it is fundamentally important for the narrative of Luke-Acts. The Infancy Narrative and the three further traditions disseminated in the main bulk of the Lukan work (Lk 8:21; 11:27-28; Acts 1:14) show that her person cannot be limited to her faith or motherhood only. The author of the third Gospel composed a careful set of scenes in order to share with his readers much fuller picture of Mary. Being a Mother of the Lord, she is also a disciple following God’s will and the teaching of her Son. In this study the author is looking for some fresh insights from the text applying methodology presented recently by C. Bennema and other scholars interested in the Gospels’ characters and their characterisation.
The importance of the temporal adverb σήμερον within Luke-Acts has long been recognized by commentators and scholars. They have been discussing for decades whether the word's significance is a purely literary one or if it perhaps carries some theological import, and the recent extensive study by Dominique Angers offers some important insights into this issue. The author of the article researches some previous attempts to elucidate this point, as well as some of the newest solutions. While proposing his own minor corrections to the study of the Canadian exegete, the author acknowledges Angers' overwhelmingly positive impact on the scholarly discussion.
PL
Waga przymiotnika czasowego – σήμερον w dziele Łukaszowym (Łk-Dz) była od dawna doceniana. Przez dziesięciolecia uczeni dyskutowali jednak, czy jego znaczenie ma charakter czysto literacki, czy również teologiczny. Najnowsza monografia kanadyjskiego egzegety, Dominique’a Angers, rzuca nowe światło na tę kwestię. Autor artykułu bada dotychczasowe próby wyjaśnienia obecności „dziś” w dwutomowym dziele, analizując zarówna starsze jak i najnowsze propozycje. Doceniając wyniki badań kanadyjskiego egzegety na dyskusję badanej problematyki zaproponowano kilka drobnych korekt jego rozwiązań.
The paper is a review of the two-volume-work of Michael Wolter. English version of his commentary is a valuable work directed to biblical scholars as well as students and wider groups of readers. The analysis focuses especially on the introduction: i.e. the concept of the commentary, its general structure, both author’s and reader’s identity, as well as the theological vision of the Lukan work. The formal feature of the commentary is also evaluated. The last part of the paper gives few examples of Wolter’s approach toward particular pericopes along with some critical observations concerning minor deficiencies or disputable solutions.
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.