Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Journals help

  1. 2 Edukacja Filozoficzna

Authors help

  1. 2 Uchan A.

Years help

  1. 1 2023

  2. 1 2021

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

Problem interpretacji myśli Parmenidesa w duchu monizmu predykatywnego i numerycznego

100%
Uchan A.
Edukacja Filozoficzna
|
2021
|
issue 71
37-57
PL
Celem pracy jest analiza koncepcji bytu w filozofii eleatów. Szczególnej analizie poddane zostały poglądy wypracowane przez Parmenidesa z Elei i opisane przez niego w heksametrycznym poemacie O naturze. Filozofia eleacka budziła już od momentu swego powstania wiele kontrowersji, również dziś uczeni nie są zgodni co do interpretacji myśli tej szkoły. Dlatego też w pracy została podjęta próba odpowiedzi na pytanie: czy bytowi eleackiemu można przypisać niematerialność? Analizie poddano także interpretację monizmu predykatywnego zaproponowaną przez Patricię Curd.
EN
The purpose of this study is to investigate the concept of being in the Eleatic philosophy. Special analysis has been devoted to the doctrine developed by Parmenides of Elea, in his poem On Nature. From its very beginning, the Eleatic philosophy has stirred controversy, even today’s scholars are not unanimous in their interpretation of the school. Therefore, the research has been done to answer the question whether immateriality can be attributed to the Eleatic concept of being, and if predicative monism interpretation proposed by Patrica Curd is valid.
2

Francisa Herberta Bradleya powrót do Parmenidesa

100%
Uchan A.
Edukacja Filozoficzna
|
2023
|
issue 76
7-40
EN
The aim of this paper is a comparative analysis of the philosophy of Francis Herbert Bradley and the monistic philosophy of Parmenides of Elea. For many years, the general philosophical consciousness was dominated by the belief that the thought of the most important British idealist was in fact a form of Hegelianism. In this paper, I show that Bradley’s thought was actually more closely related to Eleatic philosophy than to Hegel’s philosophy. In the first part I show that both Parmenides and Bradley adopted a similar epistemological position, i.e. radical rationalism. I then point out that the monism of both Bradley and Parmenides was the most radical form of monism, which was rarely seen in the history of European philosophy. Finally, I show that both Parmenides and Bradley adopt a similar view of metaphysical idealism..
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.