The paper deals with the dispute about management of the Šumava National Park. The paper characterizes the discourse on the Šumava National Park on the basis of two interviews with the representatives of the contradictory positions. It analyzes the central topics, topoi and concepts by applying the Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA). The paper focuses on the way how both interviewees construct their opponent, how they construct the attribute “human” and in which contexts they use pronouns “we” and “they”. The paper reveals that the way of displaying the past is crucial for the identification of both dominant narratives. The basic interdiscursive relations in which the discourse on the Šumava National Park is involved are also outlined.
The paper introduces Ruth Wodak’s professional career in the research area of discourse analysis, it describes the Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA) to discourse analysis via its key concepts (discourse, context, interdisciplinarity). On the basis of two case studies, it shows how the application of DHA on particular discourses looks like.
CS
Příspěvek představuje odborné působení Ruth Wodakové v oblasti analýzy diskurzu, popisuje klíčové charakteristiky diskurzivně-historického přístupu (diskurz, kontext, interdisciplinarita) a na dvou případových studiích ukazuje, jak vypadá aplikace tohoto přístupu v praxi.
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.