Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
In the interwar period Klaipeda was one of the conflictual points in post-Versailles Europe. It was a place of rivalry between neighboring states – Lithuania, Germany and Poland, so the city became the focal point of interest in the European public eye several times. Because of the Klaipeda seaport importance and its geographical location also the Vilnius press was very interested in the situation of this region. Among the journals representing different political groups were periodicals related to the national movement parties: „Dziennik Wileński” (Vilnius Daily) and „Głos Narodowy” (National Voice) which were the most important ones. Theirs journalists commented on current events and presented the ideas of solution of problems existing in the city. They also judged the actions of all involved groups and countries. Special attention was given to the issue of belongingness of the Klaipeda Region, the significance of its seaport in Poland’s economical development and the role of Klaipeda in the international policy. The article analyzes the information, opinions and concepts concerning the Klaipeda question, published in „Dziennik Wileński” and „Głos Narodowy” in the period of the Second Polish Republic.
PL
W okresie dwudziestolecia międzywojennego Kłajpeda była jednym z punktów zapalnych powersalskiej Europy. Ścieranie się na jej terenie interesów Litwy, Niemiec, a także Polski sprawiało, że kilkukrotnie stawała w centrum zainteresowania europejskiej opinii publicznej. Z racji znaczenia kłajpedzkiego portu, a także jego bliskości geograficznej przez całe dwudziestolecie sytuacją Kłajpedy żywo interesowała się także prasa wileńska. Wśród pism reprezentujących poszczególne opcje polityczne istotne miejsce zajmowały gazety związane z ugrupowaniami obozu narodowego – „Dziennik Wileński” oraz „Głos Narodowy”. Na ich łamach szeroko komentowano bieżące wydarzenia, prezentowano koncepcje rozwiązania istniejących na terenie miasta i okręgu problemów oraz oceniano postępowanie wszystkich zaangażowanych stron. Szczególną uwagę poświęcano sprawie przynależności państwowej tego terytorium, roli portu kłajpedzkiego w rozwoju gospodarczym północno-wschodnich województw Polski oraz znaczenia Kłajpedy w polityce międzynarodowej. Niniejszy artykuł stanowi analizę informacji, poglądów i koncepcji publikowanych na łamach omawianych pism.
EN
Social problems in Polish dramatic works since 1989 The article is devoted to social problems in Polish dramatic works after 1989. Many of today's dramas on the condition of the Polish population develop a discourse of trauma and provide a subjective commentary on the issues concerning Poles living in transition. The emerging new system has brought political freedom, the abolition of censorship (artistic freedom), but it has also generated other problems inherent in the laws of the market. Each transformation brings changes of an “ambivalent balance”. This could not be otherwise in the case of political, economic and cultural transformation in Poland. Sociologists write about the value duality, disorganization, cultural disorientation and even about collective trauma or shock caused by social change. At the same time, they pay attention to the positive effects of the collapse of the communist system. The authors of dramas seem not to notice the good sides and accentuate only the negative results of changes. On the basis of the stage plays (in their literary version) collected in several anthologies that appeared between 2003 and 2013 and published in the Dialog (Dialogue), the author captures the manifestations of anomie observed by the artists – playwrights as they try to adapt to new conditions, use the strategies described by Robert Merton – they are conformists, escape into ritualism, rebel and apply innovations. The artists showing social problems in dramatic works do not intend to reject a system in limine, their criticism shows reflectivity, in other words, the ability to perceive the adverse effects and formulate a positive programme that aims to inhibit or eliminate hazards and increasing social pathologies. Diagnosing the diseases in society (poverty, social exclusion, violence, dystrophy of family and social ties, consumerism, unsettled communist past etc.), the authors of dramas suggest ways of curing them: overcoming inertia, involvement in grass-roots activities and genuine, spontaneous initiatives - sine qua none conditions for the joint development of civil society.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.