Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 6

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
PL
The Europeanisation of National Public Administrations as Exemplified by the Polish European Affairs Coordination ModelThe aim of this article is to analyse the Europeanisation of Polish administration and law, politics, economy, culture and society. The process of Europeanisation has been in progress since the 1990s. Poland’s EU membership affects the structure of administrative bodies as well as the scope of their powers and the ways in which these powers are exercised with regard to foreigners and foreign entities. The EU has influenced Polish administration in many ways. One can differentiate between two stages of European- isation: before and after Poland’s EU accession, each characterised by different condi- tions. In the course of time, this process, on the whole, has been undergoing numerous changes but its importance has never decreased. The spectacular transformation of the political system prior to EU accession was followed by further changes, less visible but equally profound and remarkable, after EU accession. Obviously, most modifications related to the Europeanisation of administration and the system of governance are similar, if not the same, in all EU member states as well as the states associated with the EU. This is so because one of the fundamental principles of the EU is uniformity in the application of its law. However, this uniformity can be ensured in various ways. This is expressed and guaranteed by the principle of procedural autonomy of the Member States. Under this principle, they may adopt different legal procedures and systems, inter alia with regard to their public administration and territorial structure, as long as they ensure that EU law is applied effectively.
EN
The issue of re-nationalization (disintegration and fragmentation) of integration process is manifested by the will of some of the Member States to verify their relations with the European Union. In the age of an economic crisis of the EU and in relation to the large migration of the population, there has emerged strong social and political criticism, on the European level, of the integration process, with some Member States even consideringtheir withdrawal from the EU. In those States, demands forextending the Member States’ competences in the field of some EU policies are becoming more and more popular. The legal effects of the above-mentioned processes are visible in the free movements of the internal market, mainly within the free movement of persons. Therefore, there are problems, such as increased social dumping process, the need to retain the output of the European labour law, the issue of the so-called social tourism, erosion of the meaning of the EU citizenship and the principle of equal treatment.
PL
Przedmiotem artykułu jest analiza procesu implementacji dyrektywy Wypłacalność II, przedstawienie problematyki wejścia w życie dyrektywy oraz upływu czasu na jej transpozycję do porządku prawa krajowego. Każde z tych wydarzeń niesie bowiem odmienne konsekwencje, z najważniejszą w postaci możliwego skutku pośredniego i bezpośredniego nieimplementowanej na czas dyrektywy.
EN
This paper aims to review the Solvency II Directive implementation process, present the issues related to the Directive’s entry into force and the time needed to transpose it into domestic law. …ach of these processes has different implications, the most important of which is the possible direct and indirect consequences of a failure to timely implement the Directive.
EN
This article discusses the impact of the crisis on the processes of European integration. From this broad perspective, certain general and detailed problems have been selected for analysis, including the ‘operational code’ of European integration that was developed at the point in time when political decisions were taken to initiate the integration processes. The European Union’s operational code is based on pur¬suing the policy of fait accompli and giving priority to integration in the policies of the member states, regardless of the area of integration and the values concerned. Even the principles of democracy have been subordinated to this priority. In the light of the fact that public voting has been bypassed on issues related to integration, including economic ones, the legitimacy and effectiveness of these decisions have been called into question. The entire discussion is burdened by the lack of any funda¬mental consensus about what the political outcome of the integration should be, nor to what extent the crisis, in its various aspects (economic, political, social and dem¬ocratic), may change the European Union.
PL
rzedmiotem artykułu jest analiza charakteru prawno-instytucjonalnego europejskiego systemu nadzoru oraz unijny mandat krajowych organów nadzoru. Innymi słowy jest to odniesienie się do zakresu praw i obowiązków organów nadzoru finansowego, wywodzonych z bezpośrednio i pośrednio skutecznych aktów prawa pochodnego U…. Problemem szczegółowym poddanym analizie jest charakter prawny rozporządzenia i dyrektywy (w oparciu o przykłady relewantnych dla poruszanej tematyki rynku ubezpieczeń aktów prawnych). Szczególna uwaga skupiona zostanie także na znaczeniu prawa miękkiego (zalecenia i wytyczne), a zwłaszcza na skutku, jaki wywierają te akty w krajowym porządku prawnym, z uwzględnieniem relewantnego orzecznictwa Trybunału Sprawiedliwości UE. Osią rozważań jest pytanie, czy regulacje przyjęte w postaci zalecenia, adresowane do krajowych organów nadzoru, stanowić mogą podstawę prawną dla tych organów do wydawania wytycznych dla zakładów ubezpieczeń, niezależnie od istnienia odpowiedniego upoważnienia w ustawodawstwie krajowym, i na ile powinny one wciąż uwzględniać krajowe uwarunkowania prawne. Stawianą w artykule tezą jest, że w Unii Europejskiej rośnie wpływ niewiążących źródeł prawa – w tym także na działania organów krajowych, które są coraz silniej i jednoznacznie zobowiązane w swych działaniach uwzględniać wytyczne organów UE
EN
The aim of the paper is to review the legal and institutional nature of the European system of supervision and the “ EU mandate” of domestic supervisory authorities. To put it differently, the paper refers to the scope of rights and obligations of financial supervision authorities derived from, indirectly and directly effective, enactments of European secondary law. A detailed analysis has been made of the legal characteristics of a regulation and directive (based on legal acts relevant to the discussed issues of the insurance market). A major focus has been placed on the importance of soft law (recommendations and guidelines), and in particular on the effect these acts have on domestic legal systems, which includes a review of the relevant case-law of the European Court of Justice. The centre of discussion is the question whether regulations adopted in the form of a recommendation directed towards domestic supervisory authorities may be used by these authorities as a legal basis for issuing guidelines for insurance companies, irrespectively of any applicable authorisation specified in domestic law and whether such regulations should pay heed to domestic legal conditions. It is argued in the paper that as non-binding sources of law become increasingly more influential within the European Union, they also affect operations of domestic authorities which are obliged to follow the guidelines of the EU bodies in their operations.
EN
The aim of this paper is to present the concept of Better Regulation (BetReg), in particular its implementation mechanisms in light of the latest documents of EU bodies and its application in the European Union legislative procedures. It will illustrate both viable aspects and shortcomings of this initiative. The authors argue that the better regulation postulate has a horizontal nature. It is an initiative that brings tangible and noticeable effects; however, it must be applied as an EU legislative standard for the whole EU law: not only for that being designed or amended but also for assessing the existing law in all EU law-making institutions and countries implementing European legislation. A question is raised whether BetReg has a real impact on legislative practice or whether it remains predominantly a postulate. The hypothesis is that BetReg is already a mature project and may significantly improve the legislative environment in the EU. It should be noted that the paper covers only a fraction of the problems, the comprehensive examination of which would allow verification of the hypothesis.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.