This text is an analysis of Grzegorz Blicharz’s book on common-pool resources. The benefits which can be acquired by lawyers through using the concept of goods developed in economics have been pointed out. It is also emphasized that in Blicharz’s considerations, the use of Roman law as a specific pattern of commons regulation is a new element in the context of the hitherto literature on the subject. The author’s presentation of the public trust doctrine, developed by the US Supreme Court in its jurisprudence on environmental goods, may be relevant to Polish debates on ownership. In addition, the work of G. Blicharz can be considered a good introduction to empirical research on the legal aspects of management of jointly used water resources in Poland.
The subject of the article is the analysis of the legal regulations of the governmental legislative councils in the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic and the comparison of these institutions with the Legislative Council of the Prime Minister of the Republic of Poland. Three governmental legislative councils – for the federal government and the governments of both constituent parts of the federation – were established in Czechoslovakia in 1969 during moderate reforms of the political system which were carried out on the eve of the so-called normalization and which gave the state a federal character. Currently, existing governmental legislative councils in the Czech Republic and in the Slovak Republic were a continuation of those advisory bodies. A characteristic feature of these bodies is that their chairman is a member of the government. According to the author of the article, the mechanisms of strengthening the position of governmental legislative councils in the Czech and Slovak regulations, as well as the organization of the auxiliary apparatus of these councils should be considered particularly interesting.
Celem artykułu jest przeanalizowanie koncepcji systemu prawnego wskazanego w pracy Marii A. Kapustiny. W przekonaniu autora koncepcja ta wzbogaca dotychczasowe podejście do zagadnienia o element kulturowy. W polskiej nauce prawa nadal dominuje pojmowanie systemu prawa wyłącznie w kategoriach systemu norm, wobec tego również z punktu widzenia polskiej literatury prawniczej propozycje M. A. Kapustiny wydają się interesujące
EN
The aim of this article is to analyze the concept of the legal system presented in the work of Mariia A. Kapustina. In the author’s view, this concept adds the cultural element to the current approach to the issue. In Polish jurisprudence, the perception of the legal system only in terms of the system of norms is still predominant, thus from the point of view of Polish legal literature the proposals of M.A. Kapustina appear to be interesting.
The aim of the paper is to present legal issues concerning ritual slaughter in Poland in the interwar period (1918–1939) against a broad background of journalistic writing and parliamentary debates. Herein, arguments of both supporters and opponents of ritual slaughter are presented in detail. It is pointed out that the proponents of the ban on ritual slaughter most often referred to economic arguments regarding the need to regulate the meat market, while their opponents (mainly Judaism followers) argued that it would undermine constitutional guarantees of religious freedom. The authors analyze the legislative work leading to the adoption of the Act of 17 April 1936 on slaughter of farm animals in slaughterhouses (Journal of Laws No. 29, item 237), which restricted admissibility of ritual slaughter, as well as parliamentary work on introducing a complete prohibition of ritual slaughter in March 1938 and March 1939.
The aim of the presented paper is to analyse the legal framework for the functioning of e-government in Poland and then briefly point out the barriers of its further development and challenges which have to be faced. The e-government creating process started in Poland in 2001. The passing of Act of February 17, 2005 on cybernation of Operation of Entities Performing Public Duties was of great importance to that process. The electronic platform of the services of public administration (ePUAP) was launched finally in However, several problems undoubtedly slowed down the pace of implementing the e-government. The authors try to show that the organizational culture in the public administration offices as well as the attitudes among the society are the obstacles to make the full use of opportunities which can be given by current legal and technical solutions concerning e-government in Poland.
PL
Celem artykułu jest analiza prawnych ram funkcjonowania e-government w Polsce, a następnie krótkie przedstawienie barier jego pełnego rozwoju oraz wyzwań, z którymi należy się zmierzyć. Proces tworzenia e-administracji w Polsce rozpoczął się w 2001 roku. Przyjęcie Ustawy z dnia 17 lutego 2005 roku o informatyzacji działalności podmiotów realizujących zadania publiczne było niezmiernie ważnym etapem w trakcie tego procesu. Platforma teleinformatyczna ePUAP (elektroniczna Platforma Usług Administracji Publicznej) ostatecznie zaczęła funkcjonować w latach 2011–2012. Jednakże, pojawiające się różne problemy niewątpliwie spowolniły tempo wprowadzania e-administracji. Autorzy starają się ukazać, że kultura organizacyjna w urzędach organów administracji publicznej oraz postawy wśród społeczeństwa stanowią przeszkody na drodze do tego, by w pełni wykorzystać prawne i techniczne rozwiązania w zakresie e-administracji, które zostały wprowadzone w Polsce.
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.