Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Results found: 1

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
100%
Sociológia (Sociology)
|
2004
|
vol. 36
|
issue 4
361-376
EN
In the first part, besides a basic characterisation of the ethnomethodological approach, this paper deals with four premises concerning peculiarity of ethnomethodology. First, it entails a different object and method of research. By asking the question 'why', researchers investigate the 'practices' or 'labour' involved in producing orderly and coherent social interaction. Second, it focuses on ordinary language / speech, derived from the combined influence of the Wittgenstein and Bar-Hillel phenomenology. The third premise in the article is that 'action' and 'account' are identical. Fourthly, member's common-sense practices and knowledge is examined. The second part of the paper considers various kinds of research, mainly 'ethnographic ethnomethodology'. As an example, one of the 'degradation rituals' from Garfinkel is provided. It is suggested that Garfinkel's concept of degradation ceremonies could be elaborated upon by some Jayyussi's ideas about member's moral categorisation.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.