Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 13

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
PL
One of the most intriguing questions in political philosophy has long been the following: how to organize politics that not only appeases the conflict of groups and individuals but also allows to express even irrational beliefs. The answer that this article has dealt with is a proposition by Chantal Mouffe, called ‘agonistic democracy’. The concept is based on an claim that the exclusion of an emotional component from the public sphere can only lead to a political conflict. An example that confirms Mouffe’s assumptions is the expansion of European populism, which, according to the theory discussed in the article, may only be contained through recognizing the positive value of the conflictive nature of politics.
PL
The article accompanies the author’s translation of Quentin Skinner’s classic essay Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas. The article presents some biographical information about Quentin Skinner, one of the founders of ‘Cambridge School’ in history of politicalthought. It also comments on Skinner’s methodological positions, especially in his Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas (in its versions from 1969 and 2002),and his primary works. The article ends with presentation of several critiques of Quentin Skinner’s work, but also with appraisal of its meaning and significance to the politicalstudies.
PL
The article accompanies the author’s translation of Quentin Skinner’s classic essay Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas. The article presents some biographical information about Quentin Skinner, one of the founders of ‘Cambridge School’ in history of political thought. It also comments on Skinner’s methodological positions, especially in his Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas (comparing the two versions of the essay – from 1969 and 2002), and his primary works. The article ends with a presentation of several critiques of Quentin Skinner’s work, but also with an appraisal of its meaning and significance to the political studies.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.