Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Results found: 1

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
In this paper, the author tries to give his second and more precise response to the argument of James Sterba. According to Sterba’s words, if a good God existed, he would prevent all the horrendous evil occurrences. This is because a good God, if existed, would be a rational agent and subject to moral requirements. Regarding the Thomistic notion of eternal law, Sterba says that God is not an abstract norm. Moreover, he says that, based on Thomism, God is exonerated from the responsibility for evil. As a result, wrongdoers are exonerated from such responsibility as well. The author of this paper argues that God, while being the eternal law, is still rational. It follows that God is the perfect moral agent. Finally, the actions of God and wrongdoers are logically incomparable. The author improves the contemporary interpretation of Thomas Aquinas on some points and, by that, responds to Sterba’s objections.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.