Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 6

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Bibliometric Analysis of Top-Ranked European Law Schools’ Research Outputs: an East–West Comparison

100%
Stec P.
Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne studia nad prawem
|
2023
|
vol. 15
|
issue 1
15-33
EN
The paper deals with a bibliometric analysis of a sample of the top law schools included in the Times Higher Education World University Rankings 2022. An equal number of Western European and Central and Eastern European law schools have been analysed. The results show that both groups follow similar publication patterns. There is a clear tendency to publish in journals controlled by the authors’ universities. Citation rates in the sample are very low, and in line with what has already been found for humanities. There is a clear division between the multidisciplinary and transnational legal journals that are more international and less internationally recognised law reviews focusing on domestic issues. Law clearly follows its own publication pattern, and the East–West division is in this respect negligible: both groups perform equally well (or equally poorly) as far as the metrics indicate.
2

Między stronami mocy. Przyczynek do analizy ustrojowej uniwersów fantastycznych

100%
Stec P.
Studia nad Autorytaryzmem i Totalitaryzmem
|
2018
|
vol. 40
|
issue 4
97-115
EN
In popular parlance the Star Wars universe often serves as an example of a binary division between good Rebels and evil Empire. However, a detailed legal analysis of the turbulent political and legal history of the good old Republic and its transformation into the Empire casts doubts on this popular opinion. The Republic seems to be a degenerate system, based on exploitation of the weak, slavery and dominance of the military order (the Jedi), exercising power without any democratic control. Surprisingly, the transformation of the Republic into the Empire was formally admissible, and backed up by republican constitutional principles. Moreover, it has been purported here that the political system of the galaxy had very strong feudal relics and allowed both for vendettas and the right to rebel against the goverment. The Rebellion was in fact a counterrevolutionary movement whose main goal was to re-establish the ancient regime and anihilate the last two representatives of the schismatic Jedi sect (the Siths), while the Empire was trying to establish a ruthless, but effective system of government. Thus, what we have here is not a battle of Good against Evil but simply a civil war between conservative terrorists and authoritarian reformers. Surprisingly, a short-lived victory of the Rebellion leads to a social and economic crisis, while the restoration of the Empire by the New Order guarantees stability of the economic and political system. Moreover, imperial feuds and vendettas impact only the major players, while the commoners are not directly affected.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Best of the Best of the Best? How International are Top International Law Journals Really?

100%
Stec P.
Teka Komisji Prawniczej
|
2021
|
vol. 14
|
issue 1
429-440
EN
This paper reports a pilot study on publication patterns in the twelve top international, single-subject law journals. It has been found that these journals almost exclusively publish US law school-affiliated authors, with foreign-based lawyers authoring less than 5% of all the papers published in these journals. This outcome contrasts heavily with the outcomes for the control group of multidisciplinary science journals, where authorship distribution conformed with the number of scientists working in three macro-regions (US, EU, and China). The results of this study indicate that law journals are most probably jurisdiction-focused, and the number of citations relies more on the size of a jurisdiction covered by the journal than on the international appreciation of the texts. Furthermore, it may indicate that bibliometric factors used to measure scientific output cannot be applied 1:1 to measure the quality of legal research.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Dwa ujęcia prawa muzeów

63%
Jagielska-Burduk A., Stec P.
Muzealnictwo
|
2021
|
issue 62
236-239
PL
W artykule dokonano analizy dwóch nowych, opublikowanych w 2021 r., komentarzy do Ustawy o muzeach: pierwszego pióra A. Barbasiewicza, prawnika prowadzącego sprawy z zakresu dziedzictwa kulturowego, oraz drugiego autorstwa zespołu uczonych – Z. Cieślika, I. Gredki- -Ligarskiej, P. Gwoździewicz-Matan, I. Lipowicz, A. Matana, K. Zeidlera – specjalizujących się w prawie i postępowaniu administracyjnym oraz prawnej ochronie zabytków. Obie publikacje prezentują różne spojrzenia na ten sam problem, a tym samym wzajemnie się uzupełniają. Odmienność perspektyw sprawia przy tym, że do każdego z nich może z powodzeniem sięgnąć zarówno doświadczony praktyk, jak i osoba, dla której jest to pierwszy kontakt z tą problematyką. Obie prace napisane są, co ważne, językiem klarownym, zrozumiałym także dla nie prawników. Ich wysokiej oceny nie umniejszają wskazane w tekście recenzji nieliczne uwagi krytyczne.
5
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Two perspectives on the act on museums

63%
Jagielska-Burduk A., Stec P.
Muzealnictwo
|
2021
|
issue 62
254-257
EN
In the paper the analysis of two newly published commentaries (2021) on the Act on Museums is conducted: the first commentary by A. Barbasiewicz, a lawyer specializing in cultural heritage, and the other by a team of scholars: Z. Cieślik, I. Gredka-Ligarska, P. Gwoździewicz- -Matan, I. Lipowicz, A. Matan, K. Zeidler specializing in administrative proceedings and legal protection of historic monuments. Both publications represent various perspectives on the same issue, thus complementing one another. The difference in the approach makes them both useful to experienced practitioners on the one hand and those who happen to confront these topics for the first time one the other. Importantly, both have been written in a clear language comprehensible to non-lawyers. Their high-rating cannot be diminished by the few critical remarks formulated in the paper.
6
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Defining “National Treasures” in the European Union. Is the Sky Really the Limit?

63%
Frankiewicz-Bodynek A., Stec P.
Santander Art and Culture Law Review
|
2019
|
vol. 5
|
issue 2
77-94
EN
The main objective of this article is to analyse the scope of EU Member States’ right to determine national treasures for the purpose of Directive 2014/60/EU on the return of cultural objects. While investigating the issue at the EU, human rights, and constitutional levels, the authors argue that the right to define what constitutes national treasures is not an absolute right. The definition of this particular category of cultural objects cannot be used to circumvent the rules on the free movement of goods and to hamper this freedom in an unjustifiable and arbitrary manner. On the human rights and constitutional levels, Member States’ right cannot interfere with the right to enjoy one’s possessions. In particular, it cannot be used as a means of de facto expropriation without indemnity. There may, however, be some conflicts between the European Convention on Human Rights and national constitutional rules. For instance, in the practice of the Polish Constitutional Court, limitations on  ownership arising from the classification of personal property as a national treasure will not be considered as de facto expropriation and do not require indemnification. These differences make the position of an owner of a cultural good difficult. With ownership of cultural goods regulated by EU law, international treaties and national public law his or her situation may differ depending on which court decides the case, and on a law applied by that court.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.