Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

Od zbrodni przez media do wyroku

100%
Gruza E.
Nowa kodyfikacja prawa karnego
|
2020
|
vol. 55
21-33
EN
Every day we read about accidents, crimes, and felonies. Therefore, it is worthwhile thinking like media dazzled with the felony and cruelty, we are changing ourselves, as the narrative in the mass media can influence our mental health and sense of security. It is worthwhile looking at these problems not only from the perspective of the observer and the reader of media news reports , but also the unjustly sentenced, experiencing the effects of the media narrative.
2

Zaginieni czy zagubieni — kilka uwag o prawnych aspektach poszukiwań osób zaginionych w Polsce

100%
Gruza E.
Nowa kodyfikacja prawa karnego
|
2020
|
vol. 56
73-88
EN
Every missing persons case raises a number of legal, criminological, and psychological issues. Regardless of how we define a “missing person”, an appropriate policy must be adopted by state institutions to react appropriately. This includes the creation of guidelines on who is eligible to make a missing persons report, who is competent to undertake missing person investigations (e.g. police force), but also which of the available investigative methods and tools should be actually used when searching for a missing person.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Błędy w opiniach biegłych sądowych – w kontekście niesłusznych skazań

100%
Gruza E.
Studia Iuridica
|
2021
|
vol. 88
122-135
EN
In current domestic and foreign research and extensive discussions on the reasons for unjust convictions, the main reasons include false confession, errors in the work of investigators and the examination of evidence, including primarily incorrect opinions of experts. In the case of incorrect expert opinions, the most common reasons are insufficient qualifications and experience of the expert and carelessness of conducted research combined with low awareness of the role and importance of giving opinions in the process.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.