Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 28

first rewind previous Page / 2 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 2 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Życie i dzieło Galileusza

100%
PL
The author presents the main results of his long-term studies on the life and the work of Galileo Galilei within the group of OBI. He mentions his most important publications from this area and points to some problems that are worth elaborating upon in the future.
2
100%
PL
Recenzja książki: Corneliu C. Simuţ, Essentials of Catholic Radicalism. An Introduction to the Lay Theology of Vito Mancuso, Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main 2011, ss. 218.
PL
Recenzja książki: Volker R. Remmert, Picturing the Scientific Revolution, Philadelphia, Saint Joseph's University Press, ss. 296.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Jak drukowano Sidereus Nuncius

100%
PL
Recenzja książek: Horst Bredekamp (red.), Galileo's O. Vol. I: Galileo's Sidereus Nuncius, (wyd. Irene Brückle i Oliver Hahn) i Galileo's O., Vol. II: Paul Needham, Galileo Makes a Book, Berlin: Akademie Verlag 2011.
5
100%
Filozofia Nauki
|
1996
|
vol. 4
|
issue 1
81-97
PL
In the paper the conception of Cosmological Research Tradition, founded on the methodology of scientific research tradition introduced by L. Laudan, is proposed. A brief remark of the status of various problems in the domain of philosophy of science is also given.
6
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Kant i rehabilitacja Galileusza

100%
PL
Recenzja książki: Ed Dellian, Die Rehabilitierung des Galileo Galilei oder Kritik der Kantischen Vernunft, Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag 2007, ss. 406.
PL
John Paul's II reflection on the Galileo's case is deeply rooted in the teaching of the Vatican Council II (GS, n. 36). It's most profound expression one can find in the Pope's discourse celebrating the anniversary of Einstein's birthday given in November 1979. John Paul II emphasizes not only Galileo's sufferings caused by the Church institutions, but also invites to examine Galileo's case to create the appropriate conditions for the fruitful dialogue between science and theology. As a response the special commission was established in the year 1981. This commission was active until the year 1990, and her different sub-commissions (juridical, scientific, exegetic, and so on) published many valuable studies on Galileo's case. The conclusion of commission activity was formally celebrated by the end of 1992, during the session of Pontifical Academy of Science. Cardinal Poupard and the Pope, John Paul II delivered two, very important speeches; both of them offered a slightly different syntheses of the conclusions reached by the commission, and the second one has been interpreted by the papers as a sort of rehabilitation of Galileo. The Pope interpreted the Galileo's case as a mutual, tragic incomprehension, and stressed that, it could serve us as a lesson in the similar circumstances. And this, strictly pastoral and fostering the dialogue between science and faith approach seems to characterize John Paul's II interpretation of the Galileo's case.
8
100%
PL
Recenzja książki: Jules Speller, Galileo’s Inquisition Trial Revisited, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang GmbH - Europäischer Verlag der Wissenschaften 2008, ss. 432.
9
100%
PL
Recenzja książki: Andrea Albini, Oroscopi e cannocchiali. Galileo, gli astrologi e la nuova scienza, Grottaferrata (Rm): Avverbi Edizioni 2008, ss. 256
PL
Recenzja książki: Jacob Popper, Ereticus. L’ultima verità di Galileo, (tłumaczenie Luce D’Eramo e A. Popper), Roma: Castelvecchi 2011, ss. 382.
PL
The introduction to the first polish translation of Galileo’s letter on tides written in the begining of the year 1616 to cardinal Alessandro Orsini. The text of translation is organized in a new way, and integrated with the index of matters.
PL
The Assayer of Galileo Galilei is a classic of Italian literature. This is not only because of its formal qualities - in fact The Assayer belongs to the most important current of Italian literature, which aims at drawing the map of what people know and what people do not know (I. Calvino). The Assayer was written in the context of the discussion on comets, and responds, paragraph by paragraph, to the Libra astronomica ac philosophica firmed by Lotario Sarsi (the pen-name of Orazio Grassi). Many authors have commented this book, so important for the methodology of modern science, and Galileo's rhetoric was always indicated as one of the most significant components of this 'opera'. From the formal (i.e. rhetorical) point of view The Assayer is an example of the judicial, defensive speech. Nevertheless, in the book one can notice the presence of the epideictic speech, to which belongs the famous tale/apologue of sound. In this essay a rhetorical and narratological analysis of the apologue in question is proposed. Different interpretations of the tale are discussed, and the special attention is paid to the argument attributed to the pope Urban VIII. The tale seems to be the founding narrative of the way in which the scientist confronts himself with the nature - the point which A. Banfi expressed in his conception of copernican model of man.
EN
After the publication of Sidereus Nuncius, in the controversy with Ch. Scheiner, Galileo developed several arguments on behalf of the hypothesis that sunspots are contiguous to the surface of the Sun, and presented them in his Istoria e dimostrazioni intorno alle macchie solari e loro accidenti (Rome 1613). One of them, named by Galileo a Practical Method, advocates very clearly the correctness of the hypothesis. In the paper the method in question is briefly described. It is argued that the Practical Method is not a thought experiment, but rather a mental model proposed precisely in order to solve the problem of sunspots’ location.
Logos i Ethos
|
2022
|
vol. 59
|
issue 1
177-192
EN
The text is an attempt to answer the question about the possibility of formulating Józef Tischner’s philosophy of mountains. The reflection is based on a “sample” of Tischner’s texts; their analysis permits to indicate the way in which such philosophy can be formulated.
PL
Tekst jest próbą odpowiedzi na pytanie o możliwość sformułowania Józefa Tischnera filozofii gór. Podstawą refleksji jest niewielka „próbka” tekstów Tischnera, których analiza pozwala na wskazanie drogi prowadzącej do sformułowania tej filozofii.
15
100%
PL
Recenzja książki: Horst Bredekamp, Galilei der Künstler. Der Mond. Die Sonne. Die Hand, Berlin: Akademie Verlag 2007, ss. 518.
16
100%
Filozofia Nauki
|
1997
|
vol. 5
|
issue 4
67-74
PL
The paper presents some methodological and meta-methodological aspects of modern cosmology. Particular attention is given to the „fine” structure of the cosmological research tradition, interpreted here as a methodological model of cosmology.
PL
Recenzja książki: Vittorio Frajese, Il processo a Galileo Galilei. Il falso e la sua prova, Brescia, Morcelliana, 2010, ss. 112.
PL
The Assayer of Galileo Galilei is a classical text of the Italian literature. It was written in the context of discussions on comets and is a response, word by word, to the Libra astronomica ac philosophica signed by Lotario Sarsi but in fact written by Orazio Grassi. From the formal (i.e. rhetorical) point of view the  Assayer is an example of the judicial, defensive speech. However, in the book one can also see the presence of the epideictic speech. The epideictic speech praises the methodological values of the Copernican vision of the universe, and blames those involved in the Aristotelian and Ptolemaic approaches. In the sixth section of the Assayer there is a famous group of four rhetorical periods in which one can notice the presence of the new interpretation of the antique metaphor of the book. The rhetorical exercise developed in this essay tries to disentangle the complex node of this metaphor and gives its new interpretation. It seems that for Galileo the metaphor is not a trope but passes to the topica. At the end some considerations on dialectics of Galileo are also proposed.
19
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Galileusz

100%
PL
Recenzja książek:Maurice A. Finocchiaro, Retrying Galileo 1633–1992, Berkeley-Los Angeles-London: University of California Press 2005, ss. XII+485;Fabio Minazzi, Galileo ‘filosofo geometra’, Milano: Rusconi 1994, ss. 440;Gian Paolo Prandstraller, Le galline pavàne di Galileo, Padova: Cleup 2006, ss. 206.
Filozofia Nauki
|
1994
|
vol. 2
|
issue 3-4
93-102
PL
In the paper the contextual realism of H. Putnam's is briefly presented and accepted as an explanatory framework in which both science and every day experience are interpreted. Furthermore, a model of science as an experimental dialogue (A. Koyr) is explored. In the final section of the paper three scientific traditions: Platonic, Aristotelian, and Archimedean are recapitulated (O. Pedersen).
first rewind previous Page / 2 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.