Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Twórca a myśl estetyczna Michała Anioła Buonarrotiego

100%
Siwiec M. K.
Filo-Sofija
|
2007
|
vol. 7
|
issue 7
EN
Who is the artist as a creator (composer) in Michelangelo Buonarroti’s aesthetic thought and how could we define creativity? The author indicates that an artist is characterized by a specific capability – the capability of a creative change by means of which new values can be achieved. However, what does that creative change consist in? The author tries to enlighten the problem of an artist as a creator (composer) and creativity from two perspectives. Firstly, he discusses three main approaches to creativity in the history of aesthetics: God’s creativity, artistic creativity (of a poet and artist) and human creativity (by people of different occupational backgrounds). Secondly, he attempts to determine the hidden dimensions of the phenomenon of an artist as a creator (composer) and creativity. He describes them as versatility, unity and sourcefulness. Those three dimensions are exemplified in an aesthetic motif contained in Michelangelo Buonarotti’s emblem. That emblem constitutes a creative self-image of Michelangelo. In further considerations much attention is devoted to Michelangelo’s poetry, in which the author tries to find the evidence of sourcefulness. It is in sourcefulness where he actually sees the main element of creative change. The symbols of fire and phoenix are interpreted as particular examples of that sourcefulness. In conclusion the author points out that Michelangelo’s thought was an important step to shape the notion of artistic creativity. If creativity is determined by the three dimensions discussed, then the artist as a creator (composer) turns out to be a person able to realize them in an act of creative change and in the process of creative activity.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Wobec wyzwania Narcyza. Twórcza przemiana w koncepcji drogi twórcy

100%
Siwiec M. K.
Analiza i Egzystencja. Czasopismo Filozoficzne
|
2020
|
vol. 51
65-102
EN
In the essay, the author determines the character of the challenge posed by Narcissus-the poet – from the poem by Cyprian Kamil Norwid entitled Narcissus. The challenge is, at the same time, addressed in the context of how the creative transformation takes place on the pathway of the creator, and – more broadly – in the philosophical esthetical perspective determined by the point of view of the creator. The creative process must be understood in the light of the fundamental distinction between the sources of creation and the creative sources. The former are mere experiences and events of the life of the artist and creator, and occasion his activity only. The latter, in turn, show new directions, possibilities, realms and horizons: which all appear on the artist’s pathway. The distinction allow the insight into, and determination of, there main momenta of the creative process, which point out three phases of the pathway of the creator. The situation described in the poem might be transposed onto esthetical categories. Narcissus might be seen as the creator, and his aquatic auto-portrait as the work of art. The creative transformation, in turn, appears to bear upon the creative process. Thus, the creator is able, after having accomplished the creative transformation in the creative mirror (the result of his pilgrimage), him himself as a new-born.
PL
Autor w szkicu określa charakter wyzwania Narcyza-poety z wiersza Cypriana Norwida „Narcyz”. Jednocześnie odnosi się do tego wyzwania w kontekście wydarzenia twórczej przemiany w drodze twórcy oraz w szerszej perspektywie filozoficzno-estetycznej, którą wyznacza punkt widzenia twórcy. Rozumienie twórczej przemiany wyrasta z podstawowego rozróżnienia dwóch postaci źródeł w drodze twórcy: źródeł twórczości i twórczych źródeł. Źródła twórczości stanowią doświadczenia i wydarzenia z życia artysty, twórcy, które pobudzają jego aktywność. Twórcze źródła wskazują nowe ukierunkowania, możliwości, przestrzenie czy horyzonty, które ujawniają się artyście w jego twórczej drodze. Rozróżnienie to pozwala na wgląd i określenie trzech głównych momentów twórczej przemiany, które wprowadzają w trzy fazy drogi twórcy. Sytuacja opisana w wierszu może być transponowana na kategorie estetyczne. Narcyza możemy uznać za postać twórcy, a jego wodny autoportret za dzieło sztuki. Zaś twórcza przemiana nabiera odniesień do procesu twórczego. Zatem twórca ma szansę zobaczyć po dopełnieniu twórczej przemiany w twórczym lustrze, które jest rezultatem jego wędrówki, „siebie” jako postać nowonarodzoną.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.