Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
100%
EN
The article focuses on social and psychological aspects of criticisms of neo-liberal market model, mostly referring to the views of Leszek Balcerowicz. It points out that neo-liberal approach is based on a limited concept of freedom and its meaning in human life, underestimating the connection between freedom and ideological beliefs of people. Moreover, neo-liberalism does not take into account the fact that in conditions of economic freedom the interference between the level of individual effort (productivity) and access to goods (rewards) is weakened and may lead to self-destruction of the market system. But the shortcomings of the market mechanisms are not an argument for their replacement with state control over economy. They rather should instigate problem solving efforts.
EN
Social psychological research suggests that under certain conditions social groups can engender powerful “synergic tendencies” that facilitate development of shared cognitions among group members. As a result of these processes, the groups can reach an agreement. The purpose of this research was to identify these conditions and test their effects. The research consisted of a series of group debates concerning important issues that evoked strong controversies among the participants, i.e. parents of school children who discussed sex education in schools (20 debates, 195 participants), politicians representing right wing and left-wing parties who discussed the same topic (7 debates, 35 participants), and residents of a county at the east part of Poland who argued about the site of a garbage collection (10 debates, 100 participants). Six to 13 persons took part in each debate, which usually lasted 100-110 minutes. The debates were conducted by a facilitator according to specially prepared scenarios. Before and after the debate, participants filled out special questionnaires measuring their attitudes and some psychological variables. The debates were recorded on videotape. The obtained data support the contention that social groups tend to engender synergic forces inducing group members to seek agreements in spite of differences. They also indicate that under specific conditions (perceived importance of common tasks, induction of deliberative norms, group authority that supports the task and the norms) the groups can reach agreements even in situations of serious ideological conflict or conflict of interests. The experience of working for agreement can influence participants’ attitudes not only toward the debated issues but also toward the more general strategies of dealing with political disagreements. On the basis of the obtained data a general model of the relationship between synergic and antagonistic tendencies in groups has been formulated.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.