Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

O pewnych podobieństwach i zasadniczej różnicy w interpretowaniu tekstów prawnych oraz literackich

100%
Janicki J.
Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica
|
2021
|
vol. 97
157-168
EN
The aim of the article is to show that at a certain level of interpretation, both legal texts and literary texts are non-intrinsic – for the purposes of this kind of approximation of the perspective of the analysis of legal and literary texts, I use respectively elements of derivative theory for legal texts and elements of the theory of Susan Sontag and Eric Donald Hirsch for literary texts. Ascribing the feature of non-intrinsicality to legal and literary texts forces one to look at possible “extra-textual sources” allowing for the reconstruction of the meaning of these two types of texts. However, the fundamental difference that determines the possibilities of interpreting legal and literary texts must not be overlooked – the interpretation of legal texts is aimed at unifying their meanings, and the interpretation of literary texts (especially in the spirit of “interpretive anarchism”) may be aimed at multiplying the interpreted meanings.
PL
Celem artykułu jest ukazanie, że na pewnym poziomie interpretacyjnym zarówno teksty prawne, jak i teksty literackie mają charakter niesamoistny – dla potrzeb tego rodzaju zbliżenia perspektywy analizy tekstów prawnych i literackich wykorzystuję odpowiednio elementy teorii derywacyjnej dla tekstów prawnych oraz elementy teorii Susan Sontag oraz Erica Donalda Hirscha dla tekstów literackich. Przypisanie cechy niesamoistności znaczenia tekstom prawnym oraz literackim wymusza przyjrzenie się możliwym „pozatekstowym źródłom”, pozwalającym na zrekonstruowanie znaczenia tych dwóch rodzajów tekstów. Nie może umknąć jednak uwadze zasadnicza rozbieżność warunkująca możliwości w interpretowaniu tekstów prawnych oraz literackich – interpretacja tekstów prawnych ma na celu ujednolicanie ich znaczeń, a interpretacja tekstów literackich (zwłaszcza w duchu „anarchizmu interpretacyjnego”) może mieć na celu mnożenie wyinterpretowanych znaczeń.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Analiza porównawcza antyesencjalistycznej i Instytucjonalnej teorii sztuki

100%
Janicki J.
Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny Hybris
|
2019
|
issue 44 (1)
EN
The aim of this article is to assess critically and compare Morris Weitz’s anti-essentialist theory of art to George Dickie’s institutional one. The comparison is based on a so-called Auschwitz incydent. The article shows both differences and similarities in described theories. The scope of interest is limited to the XXth Century art, since works from this period question traditionally understood meaning of art. In the article are also briefly mentioned other concepts of art (e.g. Clive Bell’s) and the idea of artworld proposed by Arthur C. Danto, which served later as basis for other theories. The article shows that the two described theories are rather complementary than contradictory to each other.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Analiza porównawcza antyesencjalistycznej i Instytucjonalnej teorii sztuki

100%
Janicki J.
Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny Hybris
|
2019
|
vol. 44
|
issue 1
152-167
EN
The aim of this article is to assess critically and compare Morris Weitz’s anti-essentialist theory of art to George Dickie’s institutional one. The comparison is based on a so-called Auschwitz incydent. The article shows both differences and similarities in described theories. The scope of interest is limited to the XXth Century art, since works from this period question traditionally understood meaning of art. In the article are also briefly mentioned other concepts of art (e.g. Clive Bell’s) and the idea of artworld proposed by Arthur C. Danto, which served later as basis for other theories. The article shows that the two described theories are rather complementary than contradictory to each other.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Nikt nie ma prawa gardzić współczesnością

100%
Janicki J.
Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny Hybris
|
2021
|
vol. 52
|
issue 1
108-114
PL
Recenzja książki Wioletty Kazimierskiej-Jerzyk, „Kamp. Glamour. Vintage. Współczesne kategorie estetyczne". Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.