Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

Ograniczenia prawa do informacji – zagadnienia wybrane na gruncie ustawy o dostępie do informacji publicznej

100%
Banasik M.
Przegląd Prawa Publicznego
|
2012
|
issue 5
16-29
EN
The aim of the article is to discuss limitations of right to public information in Polish system of law. The right to public information is one of the most important human right in modern society. Because of the constitutional requirements every limitation of that sphere must respect two constitutional principles – principle of proportionality and necessity. We may distinguish two types of limitation of right to public information a) directly included in the Act of access to public information e.g. right to privacy, business secret and, recently imposed to the act, exceptionally important economic interest of state, and b) the limitations from other acts. International guarantees of that subjective right are the ground for creating polish system of access to public information. Public information is every information concerning public affairs. It is worth to remember that every public official, who is a subject to the Act of access of public information is obliged to furnish that information.
2

Rola prawa sędziowskiego przy odroczeniu przez Trybunał Konstytucyjny momentu derogacji normy ustawowej – aspekt sądowoadministracyjny

100%
Banasik M.
Administracja Teoria Dydaktyka Praktyka
|
2013
|
issue 3 (32)
94-114
EN
The paper aims to analyze what kind of solutions are available for the administrative court when the derogation of the legal rule contrary to the Constitution has been postponed by the Constitutional Tribunal. According to author’s view deadlock which may arise as a result of such postponement can be solved by the adopting of a concept of a free judi-cial decision and law of the administrative court. As a result the court will have two possible solutions: either to decide that legal provision in question despite Tribunal’s ruling is still binding or to pass this provi-sion over in the process of issuing a judgment. Statement according to which legal rule applied by the administrative court is contrary to the Constitution causes the rebuttal of a presumption of constitutionality of legal norms which cannot be ignored by the administrative court in the process of administration of justice. In a given case court decides on the consequences of the Tribunal’s ruling having regard to the circums-tances of the case and reasons for postponing of the ruling’s effect by the Tribunal.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Skutki orzeczeń Trybunału Konstytucyjnego dla spraw administracyjnych i sądowoadministracyjnych „w toku”.

100%
Banasik M.
Roczniki Administracji i Prawa
|
2012
|
vol. 12
185-206
PL
Orzeczenia Trybunału Konstytucyjnego mają doniosły wpływ na proces stosowania prawa administracyjnego. Przypisany im walor ostateczności i mocy powszechnie obowiązującej powoduje, że wszelkie organy władzy publicznej oraz sądy, w tym sądy administracyjne, mają obowiązek uwzględniać je w procesie stosowania norm prawnych. Postępowanie administracyjne oraz sądowoadministracyjne w określonych sytuacjach może zostać zawieszone, a następnie podjęte właśnie z uwagi na orzeczenie Trybunału Konstytucyjnego stwierdzające konstytucyjność/niekonstytucyjność określonej normy prawnej. Sąd administracyjny posiada pozycję silniejszą od organu administracji publicznej, dzięki czemu jego reakcja na orzeczenie stwierdzające niekonstytucyjność i zastosowane środki prawne mogą być dużo bardziej skuteczne. Szczególnie widoczne jest to w sytuacji, gdy TK ustala termin utraty przez niekonstytucyjny przepis mocy obowiązującej na inny dzień aniżeli termin ogłoszenia wyroku. Organ administracyjny ma w takiej sytuacji bezwzględny obowiązek dania posłuchu normie prawnej, która jest niezgodna z Konstytucją, podczas gdy sąd nie zawsze jest bezwzględnie związany zapadłym wyrokiem TK.
EN
Judgements of Constitutional Tribunal have significant impact on the process of application administrative law. The principle of finality and principle of general power of application assigned to such judgments causes, that all bodies of public authority and courts (including administrative courts) have a duty to take them into consideration in the process of application of legal regulations. Administrative and court administrative proceedings may be, in specified cases, suspended and then reopened at the basis of judgments of Constitutional Tribunal declaring certain law regulations constitutional or non-constitutional. Administrative court has a stronger position then the body of public authority and because of that its reaction on judgment declaring non- constitutionality and legal remedies used may be much more efficient. It is specifically clear in the case when Constitutional Tribunal fixes the date of loss of power of application of non – constitutional legal regulation indicating other date than the day of announciation of the verdict. The public authority has in such situation an absolute obligation to apply non – constitutional law regulation, while the administrative courts are not always absolutely bounded by the Constitutional Tribunal judgement.
4

Selected principles of a general administrative proceedings in the light of the Ordinance of the President of the Republic of Poland on Administrative Procedure of 22 nd March 1928

63%
Banasik M., Cheda D.
Administracja Teoria Dydaktyka Praktyka
|
2013
|
issue 4 (33)
160-175
EN
The paper aims to analyze selected issues of the administrative proceedings regulated by the Ordinance of the President of the Republic of Poland on Administrative Procedure issued on 22nd March of 1928. The authors focus on analyzing for example the scope of the application of the Ordinance, substantive and territorial jurisdiction of public administration bodies, the notion of the party and person concerned, ways of commencing proceedings, evidentiary proceedings and evidence, issuing of a decision and appeal proceedings. The assessment is conducted in the light of the current regulation of the Code of Administrative Proceedings. Authors underline numerous similarities between the Ordinance and current Code. These similarities prove legislative quality of the pre – WWII regulation especially high objectivity and impartiality standards of rulings introduced by the Ordinance. The paper ends with stressing of the law – making role played by the Highest Administrative Tribunal and its contribution to the interpretation of the provisions of the Ordinance.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.