Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
Konteksty Kultury
|
2022
|
vol. 19
|
issue 2
205-221
EN
The paper is a hermeneutic attempt at parallel, messianic reading of the two modern narratives – Melville’s story about Bartleby, the poor scrivener and the Freudian joke about the French king. The main point of the text is to speculatively treat these two formulas as the acts of resistance, which succeeded in overcoming and disenchanting what Foucault calls the Power. The author treats the novella and the joke as parables which are inherently ironic and comic in the Hegelian sense, which means, that they operate on and thus shatter the symbolic order and such dichotomies as the lack and the excess, the transcendental and the material as well as the absolute and the concrete. Confronting the readings of “Bartleby” by Deleuze and Derrida and supplementing them with Bloch’s messianic hope, enables the author to claim, that the scrivener and the jester are figures of subversion, if not revolution. What comes next is the analysis of above-mentioned allegories that use theories of comedy by Zupančič, and McGowan, showing that they are in fact the stories about becoming of the modern subject and the latter one emerges in the structure of the comic play of power and resistance. The paper claims that scrivener and the jester show us that there is, in fact, hope for the fragile and precarious modern being mercilessly subjugated to the power.
PL
Niniejszy artykuł jest próbą hermeneutycznego, równoległego czytania dwóch nowoczesnych narracji – Melville’a o Bartlebym, biednym skrybie, i Freudowskiego dowcipu o francuskim królu. Głównym gestem zawartym w tekście jest spekulatywne potraktowanie tych formuł jako skutecznych aktów oporu, którym udało się przezwyciężyć i odczarować to, co Foucault nazywa Władzą. Autor traktuje nowelę i dowcip jako parabole, które są inherentnie ironiczne i komiczne w Heglowskim sensie, co oznacza, że operują na, a więc rozbijają porządek symboliczny i takie dychotomie, jak brak i eksces, transcendentalne i materialne, absolutne i konkretne. Skonfrontowanie Deleuzjańskiego i Derridiańskiego odczytania Bartleby’ego oraz uzupełnienie ich mesjańską nadzieją Blocha pozwala autorowi postawić tezę, że skryba i żartowniś są figurami subwersji, a być może nawet rewolucji. Następująca później analiza powyższych anegdot wykorzystująca teorie komedii Zupančič i McGowana ukazuje, że są to opowieści o stawaniu się nowoczesnego podmiotu w strukturze komicznej gry władzy i oporu. Tekst postuluje, że skryba i żartowniś pokazują nam, że jednak istnieje nadzieja dla delikatnych i prekarnych nowoczesnych bytów podporządkowanych przez władzę.
EN
This article seeks to reconstruct and redefine the low fidelity (lo-fi) musical culture – the music(-related) discourse and aesthetics of the unfavourable signal-to-noise ratio. Today, the term applies to the dynamically growing genre, production methods, styles and conventions in the broadly defined popular music, as well as the distribution and consumption practices related to the growing popularity of the analogue medium. The genesis of the latter is explored on the example of case studies illustrating the changes in and the reception of the relationship between music and technologies for the recording, editing, modification and reproduction of the audio signal. The case studies are confronted with the critical and philosophical approaches to noise, sound and cultural industry, allowing us to put forward the thesis that the lo-fi culture emerges as a gesture of resistance to the dehumanising acceleration of modern culture. As such it is an attempt to reproduce the aura of authenticity and search for contact with another human being through music.
Wielogłos
|
2022
|
vol. 53
|
issue 3
29-48
EN
The text proposes to read Bartleby, the Scrivener as a case of modern genealogy of Otherness. The aporias in Melville’s intertextual prose loudly reverberate in theology and philosophy – therefore one cannot read Melville’s novella without referencing the Bible but also the writings of Blanchot, Derrida, Levinas, Deleuze. Bartleby owes his popularity to the genius of Melville, who, by commenting on the America of his times, included in his short prosaic works hundreds of ambiguous and internally contradictory tropes. The aporias which we now call Bartleby have been discussed by such contemporary critics as Žižek and Butler, who in the formula “I would prefer not to” see the outline of an emancipatory project in late-modernity capitalism. “Compression Effect” is the literary testimony of the experience of a new community which faces an “excess” of politically and religiously engaged texts with a simultaneous “shortage” of divinity in life institutionalized by modernity.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.